Saturday, January 3, 2026
European Ancestry (23andMe)
Saturday, September 6, 2025
Jesuits in the Kingdom of Prester John
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Muslim Spain Reconsidered
Thursday, May 22, 2025
"Berber" Ancestry
A feature Ancestry and 23andme must (re)introduce is a chromosome browser that shows the user where exactly their DNA matches another user's. MyHeritage, which is less accurate, already offers this feature for free. However, since their DNA estimates are less accurate, we are forced to use DNA Painter's features to copy the chromosome breakdowns from 23andme or Ancestry to see the assigned "ethnicity" for sections of each chromosome. This convoluted process creates more work, and should be something available for free on Ancestry and 23andme. Doing so would illuminate how exactly one shares DNA with other users. This feature on My Heritage shows us, for instance, where we share DNA with North Africans. In the above example, with someone of Algerian heritage, we share 9.3 cM of DNA on a section of my third chromosome assigned to "North African" by Ancestry. This suggests that we likely harbor small amounts of "Amazigh" ancestry that can still be matched with random people from Morocco and Algeria. In our case, since we do not know of any recent admixture, we assume this is from one (or two) of 2 scenarios: ancient "Guanche" admixture from ancestors who came to the Caribbean via the Canary Islands or via ancient "Berber" admixture in parts of the Iberian Peninsula which contributed to the early peopling of the Spanish Caribbean. Either way, the fact that we have found multiple matches who share segments of DNA on parts of our chromosomes assigned to "North Africa" suggests "Berber" admixture. We need this feature to facilitate understanding of our West and Central African matches from places like Ghana, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, and other countries. It would also be very useful when looking at matches who are a mix of different African nationalities.
Wednesday, May 21, 2025
North African Ancestry Via Chromosome Painting
Monday, April 21, 2025
North African Ancestry in the (Spanish) Caribbean
Sunday, August 14, 2022
Kingdoms of Faith
Sunday, October 31, 2021
Noah Howard's Ole
Thursday, January 28, 2016
Jazz, Coltrane, Sanders, Lorca
Monday, June 15, 2015
The Dominican Republic and the Beginning of a Revolutionary Cycle in the Spanish Caribbean: 1861-1898
Friday, April 10, 2015
The Conquistadors: A Very Short Introduction
Instead of being received as "gods," native societies always perceived them as humans from a remote, distant part of the world (thus playing a role in the aforementioned stranger-effect). Moreover, many of the conquistadors were of African descent, such as Juan Garrido, a few were women, and the vast majority were indigenous leaders or polities who saw the Spanish as arbitrators, a way to access new privileges, and weaken their enemies from other indigenous polities. This also helps push away condescending assumptions regarding Native America as being full of "superstitious" natives who saw Europeans as gods instead of making decisions as rational actors leading advanced civilizations of their own kind.
The text also displays how the Spanish conquistadors were basically armed entrepreneurs, privately funded, and quite uneven in a process of colonialism that lasted for 3 centuries. Some indigenous societies, such as the Mapuche, were never conquered while groups in areas of Colombia, the Yucatan, or the US Southwest took centuries to "conquer." Indeed, many of the touted advantages the Spanish allegedly enjoyed were likely minimal in combat, such as their firearms, the diseases they introduced (which also affected their indigenous allies, and in some cases, the outbreaks only came after the conquest), their horses (sometimes not useful in mountainous terrain or hostile climates), and their steel (which, though stronger than obsidian or wooden weapons utilized by Aztecs or other people of the Mexican central valley, were not always the most convenient to wield). In fact, many Spanish adopted the styles of armor, footwear, head protection, and dress of locals.
Furthermore, many if not most of the conquistadors were not formally trained in war, making their dependence on indigenous allies and African auxiliaries even more necessary. Therefore, an understanding of indigenous socio-political systems is necessary to begin to comprehend how and why so many indigenous polities were willing to side with the Spanish, only to have their privileges revoked after the conquests (such was the fate of the Nahua who made the Spanish conquest of Mexico happen). As a very short book on the subject, Matthew Restall and Felipe Fernandez-Armesto provide an exemplary introduction to a complex event in the creation of the early modern world.
Sunday, March 9, 2014
Cantigas de Santa Maria
Sunday, March 2, 2014
Black Conquistador in Mexico
Friday, November 1, 2013
Jíbaro from 18th Century Art
The Question of Mestizos in the Early Hispanic Caribbean
Schwartz correctly notes the importance of the Spanish conquest and later slavery in redefining social categories in a very short period of time. Indeed, the role of sex in the Spanish conquest and colonial project is also mentioned in records, beginning as early as 1492, so there is plenty of evidence of the existence of 'mestizos' of Indian descent, yet their absence is conspicuous. Indeed, as Schwartz demonstrates, political interests of the Spanish played a role in motivating formal marriages with indigenosu women, such as the daughters of caciques, to gradually "Hispanicize" the elites of the island (7). Of course, rape, pillage, and other forms of violence would increase the numbers of mixed-race individuals. Marriage between encomenderos in Hispaniola, for instance, often united Spanish men with Indian women, as well as forms of concubinage (8).
Moreover, the Lando census of the 1530s in Puerto Rico likely reveals a euphemism for mixed-race women of the island, mujures de esta tierra (8). In addition, the colonial ecclesiastical authorities deplored the prevalence of single men involved with women in informal unions, part of the reason the colonial authorities wanted more white women from Europe to marry disproportionately male colonists (8). I am inclined to agree with Schwartz that the disappearance of Indians and mestizo identities reflects the incorporation of mixed-race descendants of Indian women into the 'white' or Spanish category in the colonial society of Puerto Rico. How else could whites, who were outnumbered by blacks and Tainos from the 16th century be so numerous, if not for the 'whitening' of mestizos? They and their descendants who were born legitimately, adopted the Spanish language, Roman Catholicism, and therefore entered into 'whiteness' could become 'white' in census data throughout the colonial period (10). This would explain why historians such as Francisco Scarano wrote that mestizos outnumbered whites by the 17th century yet no mestizos were counted in colonial census figures in Puerto Rico.
Schwartz fortunately gives numerous examples from colonial Cuba and Santo Domingo of known European-Indian unions resulting in children, yet the children were never classified as 'mestizo,' proof of the permeability of whiteness in the early Spanish Caribbean (11). Indeed, this comes as no surprise, since race is a social category. Therefore, some will 'become white' or 'Spanish' despite obvious miscegenation in the Caribbean. Unsurprisingly, some 'whites' in the the Spanish Caribbean were never considered such by European visitors, who noted their multiracial background and looked down upon them for it (Schwartz refers to the case of a visitor to Puerto Rico in 1783 who noted the rarity of pure whites). Again, this is not a surprise given the smaller and smaller Indian population of the island due to incorporation of their mixed progeny into the 'white' category and their own decline due to disease and Spanish violence and exploitation. Their 'mixed' descendants were left to marry or reproduce with whites, Africans, or among themselves (13).
Naturally, the slave trade and the importance of slavery brought an enormous increase in the black population. Like the rest of the Spanish colonies in Latin America, the 'stain' associated with black ancestry and slave descent became a significant social marker that widened the definition of 'pardos' to include people of Amerindian descent into a broader 'brown' or racially mixed category so that by the 17th and 18th centuries, Puerto Rico, the Spanish Caribbean, and much of the rest of Latin America blocked access to power and certain professions to people of mixed-race descent. Thus, some people partly descending from indigenous people in Puerto Rico became white while by the 17th century, some were also absorbed into the expanding Afro-descended 'pardo' category.
The importance of this for the elasticity of race also pertains to the question of Taino revivalism in Puerto Rico and elsewhere in the Hispanic Caribbean. So, yes, Tainos did not disappear off the face of the earth genetically, since the progeny of Spanish unions with indigenous women survived as part of the 'creole' mixed-race population, yet Puerto Rico remains most impacted demographically by European and African immigration. As for the question of culture, Puerto Rico would also appear to owe more to Spanish and African sources than some of the revivalist movement's supporters like to claim, despite the great importance of indigenous-European encounters in the early years of contact. The fact that colonial administrators and elites did not recognize "Indian" as a social category in Puerto Rico because they were largely 'mestizo' and whitened demonstrates that, though creolization in the broader sense occurred for both the Spanish settlers and Indians, their joint descendants were seen as "Spanish" and therefore probably preserved and honored more of their European heritage due to its dominance in colonial society.
Undoubtedly, indigenous practices could thrive or survive in some altered form, but it's just not correct to call them "Taino" anymore. They were no longer identified as such. Their culture was transformed and reconfigured into a 'creole' culture that was, as one can see from census data and other sources, neither self-identifying as "Taino" nor practicing 'purely' Taino-derived customs. Of course, one can see the survival of indigenous phenotypes and, as mentioned previously, some Taino and other Amerindian customs, but Europe and Africa were the largest demographic factors in Puerto Rican colonial society and they too were creolized and fused into something different. Therefore, in my humble opinion, it is dishonest and ahistorical to claim a "Taino" identity as a Boricua myself given the overwhelmingly 'criolla' identity of Puerto Rico for the past several centuries. Tainos are part of the 'three roots,' unquestionably so, but cannot be ahistorically placed on a pedestal nor romanticized as some of us are wont to do. I love and appreciate our Taino ancestors as much as the next person, but they're only one rather small component of Puerto Rican identity given their descendants' cultural assimilation into 'white' colonial society and the rise of a 'criolla' majority where miscegenation meant few whites were 'purely' of European descent and popular culture was significantly shaped by African slaves and their descendants.
This history of flexible whiteness may also help explain patterns of 'whitening' among people of African descent and the growth of self-identified 'white' Puerto Ricans in census data taken from the beginning of US rule to the present. And the fact that the 'white' peasants of the mountainous Puerto Rico (jibaros), Dominican Republic (monteros) and Cuba (guajiros) are so key to defining national identity for these islands speaks tot he importance of indigenous history because these peasants were hardly as 'white' as they might seem.
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Afro-Iberia: Blacks in Medieval and Renaissance Iberia
Sunday, August 7, 2011
Miles Davis, Sketches of Spain, and Spanish Folk Music
My research into some of these Spanish folk forms brought me to Alan Lomax's field recordings of Spanish music in the 1950s or around that period. Two of the songs from Alan Lomax's field recordings were adapted and arranged by Gil Evans for his large ensemble and Miles Davis on their 1960 release, Sketches of Spain. The two folk songs used by Evans are "Alborada de Vigo," a song from Galicia in northwestern Spain, and "Saeta," religious music performed in the towns of Andalusia during Semana Santa, or Holy Week. Lomax's recording of "Alborada" features flute and is much shorter than Gil Evan's vision of it. "Saeta," however, is arranged quite faithfully by Evans. It mixes the march and horns with the flamenco/Middle-Eastern-styled vocals of the Spanish singer in Lomax's recordings. Indeed, Gil Evans and Miles Davis's version of "Saeta" is so faithful that Davis's solo echoes the haunting beauty of the Spanish vocalist.
Here is "Alborada de Vigo"
http://grooveshark.com/s/Alborada+De+Vigo/3Tyl2w?src=5
And "The Pan Piper," the song from Gil Evans and Miles Davis which is takes the melody for the opening line.
Alan Lomax's field recording of "Saeta" in Sevilla or some other Andalusian town. Love the melismatic singing
http://grooveshark.com/s/Saeta/3TyxA5?src=5
Miles And Gil Evans
The final track on Sketches of Spain is "Solea," which is based on a form of flamenco form/dance.
Here is Spanish guitarist Paco de Lucia performing a solea
Here is a dance
And now the jazzed up version



















