Showing posts with label Sahel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sahel. Show all posts

Thursday, March 12, 2026

A Tentative Reconsideration of the Reign of Dunama b. Ali (1696-1715)

 

Pages of the Shurb al-Zulal by Shaykh Hajrami in Bivar and Hiskett, "The Arabic Literature of Nigeria to 1804: A Provisional Account."

           One Sayfawa mai whose reign has not received adequate analysis is Dunama b. Ali (r. 1696-1715). A son of Ali b. Umar (c. 1639-1677), Dunama succeeded his brother, Idris, who perished in 1696. As Idris died en route to Mecca on the pilgrimage, it is unclear if Dunama b. Ali was perhaps already acting as a regent or if he came to the throne through other means.[1] Nonetheless, from the potentially destabilizing moment of succession, Dunama b. Ali was able to occupy the throne for approximately 19 years. Despite Muhammad Nur Alkali’s portrayal of him as inexperienced and unpopular, revisiting the extant sources on this mai presents a more nuanced picture.[2] Instead, Borno during the reign of Dunama b. Ali remained economically vibrant, influential across the region, and well-poised to respond to external threats or complications. This essay argues that the reign of Dunama b. Ali was not a period of political weakness, as suggested by Muhammad Nur Alkali, but rather one in which Borno maintained regional influence, economic vitality, and the institutional stability of the Sayfawa state. This tentative analysis shall endeavor to demonstrate this through a review of the various sources pertinent to Dunama b. Ali’s reign and conditions in the Central Bilad al-Sudan during the late 17th century to early 18th century. Dunama b. Ali’s dynamic reign will be seen as more successful and historically significant for the polity of Borno.

Muhammad Nur Alkali on Dunama b. Ali

            First, how did Borno historian Muhammad Nur Alkali assess the reign of Dunama? According to Alkali, Dunama b. Ali (rendered as Dunoma ibn Ali) was an inexperienced ruler. The reference to him as Mai Leram Ngalugalaba implied that he was “the Mai who was care-free and incapable of keeping official secrets.”[3] It is not always easy to tell from where Alkali obtained his information. To quote further, “He appears to have been a very unpopular ruler as the hardship that befell the kingdom was attributed to his lack of encouragement and support for the ulama.”[4] This portrayal of Dunama b. Ali’s reign as especially unsuccessful seems to be based on the report in the Diwan of a famine that allegedly lasted 7 years.[5] Yet Alkali had described the reign of Idris b. Ali, Dunama’s brother, as one in which he withdrew to Gamboru (Gambaru). Furthermore, besides his death and the burial in Traghen, extraordinarily little can be said for the reign of Idris b. Ali.

            Despite the analysis of Alkali, a second look at all the available sources suggests a more complicated narrative. Palmer, for instance, recalls traditions of Dunama b. Ali’s success in reducing banditry as “Dunama, the warrior, who suppressed robbery, of renowned fame, the marvel of marvels, who was buried in the district of Kowwa.”[6] John Lavers has likewise emphasized a more positive appraisal of his reign through his initiation of peace talks with Kwararafa by 1706.[7] That Borno exerted some degree of control over trans-Saharan routes to the Fazzan is implied by French sources, too. Since the king of Borno was able to command tribute for the passage of caravans to Borno from the Tripoli-Fazzan-Kawar route, the Sayfawa state system was still able to maintain secure trade routes.[8]

As for the impact of the lengthy famine, this undoubtedly fueled unrest and caused suffering in Borno. Yet later testimony from Ali Eisami suggests the resourcefulness of the people of Borno in times of duress. Indeed, according to Eisami, the people had access to tree-leaves, tree-fruits and edible herbs. Thus, “Bornu is pleasant for the poor: when there is a famine, it never kills many people; there are many fruit-trees and many eatable herbs; therefore a famine never kills many people.”[9] Obviously, an extended famine that lasted for up to 7 years would have incurred more suffering and hunger. It also may have contributed to population movements and conflict over resources between nomadic pastoralists and sedentary farmers. Unfortunately, without further data, it is difficult to assess the impact of famine during Dunama b. Ali’s reign or even when it took place.

Next, the question of support for the ulama. This is partly complicated by Shaykh Hajrami’s didactic fiqh verses, Shurb al-zulal. However, the sources from the reign of Dunama b. Ali suggest another relationship with the ulama of Borno. For example, Dunama b. Ali may have been the mai who welcomed the Koyam shaykhs, whose community at Kalumbardo was destroyed in 1677, to settle in Gaskeru. Controversy exists over whether this deed was done by Dunama b. Ali or his son, Hamdun.[10] Nevertheless, if Dunama b. Ali had been willing to relocate a Fulani community so the Koyam Shaykhs could renew their works in Borno, he was  doing so out of both sincere support for Islam as well as political reasons. Similarly, Dunama b. Ali also ratified a mahram for descendants of a Fulani Islamic leader, Gabidama, whose community was exempted from taxation.[11] Lastly, he may have been pivotal in the early Islamization of Mandara if one accepts Barkindo’s chronology for the kings of Mandara.[12] These actions suggest Dunama b. Ali did support the ulama to at least some extent. His support for the Islamization of places like Mandara likewise illustrates a commitment to spreading the faith beyond the confines of Borno or the Kanuri peoples. Doing so necessarily involved the ulama, who were required as teachers of the faith in Mandara, among the Bolewa of Daniski, or in other communities.

In short, there were several problems with the portrait of Borno during the reign of Dunama b. Ali. Many are perhaps due to the problematic and sometimes unreliable source material for this era. Others are based on erroneous assumptions based on the Diwan or presumptions that Hajrami’s verses were a denunciation of corruption in Borno. In the case of Muhammad Nur Alkali, the largely negative portrayal of Dunama seems to pertain to the famine and traditions suggestive of an inexperienced or perhaps unpopular leader. In the absence of additional evidence speaking directly to the effects of famine or conflicts with the ulama, one should adopt a tentatively skeptical approach. At least in comparison with his brother, Dunama b. Ali’s reign can be seen to have achieved more for Borno’s goals in trans-Saharan commerce, establishing more peaceful relations with Kwararafa and supporting the spread of Islam beyond the confines of the state.

The Origins of Dunama b. Ali and His Family

As indicated by his name, Dunama was the son of Ali b. Umar. His maternal ancestry, however, linked him to the ruling line of Marte. Indeed, according to one gargam, Dunama’s mother, Askara, was the daughter of the Martema.[13] Marte, a town said to have been founded before Gazargamo, was established by Martema Muhammad Wayumi. Peopled by Magumi, the city was an early one inhabited by people claiming shared ancestry with the ruling dynasty of Kanem and Borno.[14] Consequently, Dunama b. Ali may have been entirely “Kanuri” in his ancestry. To what degree his maternal ancestry linking him to Marte shaped his own reign is unknown, but it is possible he was supported by a faction of Magumi descent from that region to ascend the throne.

Apparently, Dunama b. Ali also had a sister, Aisha (Ayesha) bint Ali. Although it is not known if she was also a full sister, she is one of the few elite women affiliated with Dunama b. Ali to appear in written sources. A mahram dated by Palmer to 1704 names his sister as the Sokotoma[15] to whom the Fulani beneficiaries were passed.[16] The mention of a magaram in the context of a mahram is quite intriguing and suggests elite women engaged in both religious and secular contexts of land tenure. In fact, when the mahram was ratified by Dunama b. Ali, the person who approached the king for the descendants of Gabidama was a princess named Gusa Larabaramma. This suggests the mairam were also involved in interceding on behalf of respected Islamic holymen.

Like his brother, Idris, he too may have undertaken the pilgrimage to Mecca. It is known that Idris Alooma brought  his sister with him during his hajj.[17] It is possible that Dunama b. Ali had accompanied his father during one of his voyages to Mecca, too. The evidence is ambiguous as some sources present Dunama as one of the many Sayfawa maiwa who performed the hajj. For instance, a list in verse of the Sayfawa maiwa describes the mai, “His brother, Dunama, son of Ali, was surnamed “the unfortunate.” Dunama completed his pilgrimage to the House of God and visited the wonderful garden of the Prophet.”[18] Through the correspondence of the French consul in Cairo, notice of two sons of Dunama b. Ali’s voyage to Mecca was recorded in 1707.[19] It is possible one of these Sayfawa maiwa in Cairo was Hamdun b. Dunama (r. 1715-1729).

The question remains when Dunama b. Ali went on the hajj and to what extent the cited list of Sayfawa maiwa in verse is accurate. Many questions remain on the nature of Dunama b. Ali’s rise to the throne and how his connections to Marte may have influenced that outcome. This mai appears to have been of Magumi descent on both sides of his family and had at least one sister, Aisha, who participated in the state’s relationship with ulama.

Borno and Foreign Relations: Kwararafa, Mandara and Beyond

            One area in which Dunama b. Ali’s reign was successful is the maintenance of order and security. This can be glimpsed in the available sources on Borno’s relations with Hausaland, Kwararafa, and Mandara. Relations with other states in the region need far more attention. For similar reasons, lamentably, not enough sources exist. But from reports of Borno that reached French consuls in Tripoli, one can glimpse aspects of a relatively successful system of foreign relations. Through these consular reports, a partial view of Borno and its reputation as a great power are discernible. In this case, the reports of French consul Claude Lemaire are especially significant. Quoted in Zeltner’s Tripoli, carrefour de l'Europe et des pays du Tchad, 1500-1795, Lemaire’s letters refer to events in Borno and Tripoli during the reigns of Idris b. Ali and Dunama b. Ali. They are especially useful for the enigmatic references to Kwararafa, a non-Muslim state which threatened Kano and Borno during this time. Other sources, like Pétis de la Croix’s report on Tripoli, provide much data on trans-Saharan trade during this period as well as what may be the earliest Kanuri wordlist.[20] Additional sources such as oral traditions from the vassal states of Borno like Muniyo or the Kano Chronicle provide insights into historical developments on the margins of Borno or in Hausaland. Though hardly an abundant body of sources, they provide a usable framework for contextualizing Borno’s relations with other states during this time.

            Naturally, the largest threat to Borno appears to have been Kwararafa. Already documented for its attacks that reached Birni Gazargamo during the reign of Ali b. Umar, reports of further conflict reached Europeans in Tripoli.[21] Despite Lemaire reporting in 1686 that Borno could muster 300,000 troops, undoubtedly an exaggerated figure, Kwararafa remained an unsubdued foe.[22] Indeed, as late as 1707, Fr. Damiano reported, “Par toutes les informations que j’ay pris, il me parait que le Sultan de Gourourfa est le plus puissant des roys naigres puisqu’il a rédhuit celluy de Bornoux à luy demander la paix, après l’avoir vaincu en plusiers batailles.”[23] Evidence from Kano demonstrates the military successes of Kwararafa since this state was able to overrun the capital, defeating Dadi (r. 1670-1703).[24] The motivation for Kwararafa’s actions against Borno and Kano in this time are not known, but it has been speculated that an attempt by the pagan state to ensure its access to trans-Saharan trade and northern markets could have been a factor.[25]

            By the reign of Dunama b. Ali, however, relations with Kwararafa appear to have changed. From wars or military conflict, Borno seems to have sought peaceful relations with its southern neighbor. By 1706, Lemaire was informed of peace between the two powers and that a Kwararafa ambassador was in Borno (presumably Birni Gazargamo).[26] Unfortunately, the sources are silent on this process, but it is perhaps around this moment when Borno sent a zannuwa to Wukari. In addition, 19th century sources suggest the Jukun became tributaries of Borno. According to Ali Eisami, the Dsuku (Jukun) were reported to have paid annual tribute of 1000 slaves to Borno.[27] Undoubtedly, this figure is an exaggeration, but it may speak to a shift towards profitable trade between Kwararafa and Borno during the 1700s. Achieving peace on this front was thus of great importance for Borno’s security on its southern frontiers.

            Besides shifting toward peaceful relations with Kwararafa, Dunama b. Ali was likely the Sayfawa ruler who initiated the Islamization of Mandara. Mandara’s first Muslim ruler, Bukar Aji, who became king in c. 1715, was said to have received scholars from Borno. Indeed, Dunama b. Ali likewise sponsored the sending of scholars to the Bolewa to encourage Islamic conversion.[28] An Arabic chronicle from Mandara similarly emphasizes the role of Borno in Mandara’s Islamization. Its first Muslim king, Bukar Aji, was said to have been from Birni Gazargamo and had a Kanuri mother. Furthermore, “Pour l’aider dans sa grande tâche de conversion, il emmena avec lui plusiers marabouts Kanouri, dont Maloum Mar Makkama qui fut le fondateur de la famille des Moufallama ou Moufalla."[29] If one accepts Barkindo’s date for 1715, it would seem that Dunama b. Ali was instrumental in the coming to power of Mandara’s first Islamic ruler.

With Kanuri mallams and immigrants already settled in parts of Mandara, this ensured Mandara would, for a time at least, remain culturally tied to Borno. Indeed, according to Barkindo, some Bornoan communities had been settled in Mandara for at least 2 generations by the reign of Bukar Aji. Despite later maiwa encountering difficulties with Mandara, traditions suggest Bukar Aji and his successor regularly sent gifts or tribute to Borno.[30] Consequently, Dunama b. Ali and Hamdun b. Dunama’s actions here can be conceived of as a success in extending Borno’s influence to a deeper level in Mandara whilst ensuring Bornoan communities there would retain their connections to the Sayfawa state.

Beyond Kwararafa and Mandara, Bornoan influence extended as far east as Darfur and west into Zazzau and other lands such as Nupeland. In Zazzau, the eminent position of Limaman Kona was established by the early 1700s.[31] In distant Darfur, Bornoan pilgrims and scholars were settling in Darfur during the reigns of Sulayman Solong and Ahmad Bukr. Of the Keira sultans of Darfur, Nachtigal specifically alluded to Ahmad Bukr for his role in inviting people from Borno, Bagirmi and the Nile regions to settle in the kingdom.[32] It is likely that the pilgrims who traversed the eastern Sudanic roads from Borno to Sinnar included mystics or Sufis from Borno and the Fazzan. Krump’s observations of them in a caravan, particularly their manner of jumping and singing, suggest a form of Islamic mysticism in which Borno at this time was clearly part of.[33] The presence of traders and mystics along this route suggests Borno was an active participant in the exchange of both goods as well as ideas of religion and spirituality across the Sudanic belt and the Sahara. Since Dunama b. Ali’s reign coincided with these developments, one cannot say this mai neglected the ulama or failed to uphold the power (and allure) of Borno across much of the Central Bilad al-Sudan. No small part of this authority of the Sayfawa was symbolic, generated by the long-lasting dynasty’s reputation for piety, support for Islamic scholarship, and frequent pilgrimages.[34]

Sufis from Borno may have also traveled to Morocco where, a Sidi ‘Abd al- ‘Aziz b. Mas’ud al-Dabbagh wrote of receiving lessons from a shaykh named Abd Allah al-Barnawi. The Bornoan shaykh was said to have died in Borno in 1714/15, but ambiguity remains on the historicity of this figure.[35]  Assuming this figure is not a mystical vision of the Kalumbardo leader who perished in the 1670s, there was a prominent Sufi teacher active in Morocco and Borno during the reign of Dunama b. Ali.

In summation, a cursory examination of Borno’s foreign relations during the reign of Dunama b. Ali reveals a powerful state which held enormous sway and influence. From wars to peace with Kwararafa, Borno found peace on this part of its southern frontier. Through the Islamization of Mandara’s ruling dynasty, Borno extended its influence through Bornoan migration and the conversion to Islam of Mandara’s elite. Other states like Zaria were within Borno’s sphere of influence, too. To the east, Bornoans were active in Darfur and even on the early east-west pilgrim traffic and trade from the Nile to Lake Chad. Dunama b. Ali’s reign appears to have been mostly successful in the assertion of Sayfawa authority.

Domestic Affairs

Naturally, one must consider domestic or internal affairs when assessing the reign of a king. In this case, our sources emphasize the famine of 7 years. Yet famine was not the only event which entered the annals. Sources suggest a state of general security in the kingdom with trans-Saharan trade routes reliably under Bornoan control. Likewise, the domestic conditions regarding state-ulama relations or the state’s support for Islam have also raised questions. Yet closer inspection demonstrates the state’s overall success in managing internal affairs and supporting the religious establishment in this period.

First, the question of famine. As previously mentioned, later accounts suggest periods of famine were not necessarily an insurmountable challenge. The people of Borno had access to plants, herbs, and fruits from the woods or forested regions which became a major source of sustenance in times of famine. Of course, if famine conditions persisted for 7 years, much hardship would have developed. Unsurprisingly, migration from areas without food could have sparked conflict over scarce resources as pastoralist nomads migrated south. It may be that in this context, Dunama b. Ali’s suppression of robbery was in part an attempt by the government to maintain order during the extended period of famine. Moreover, there is evidence to suggest that, in theory, the state controlled a bayt al-mal which, ideally, would support the poor during moments of duress. Ethnographic research in Kanem has revealed the existence of this institution during the period of the alifate of Mao. According to Robert Bouille, this caisse publique not only provided support for mallams and the maintenance of mosques but also fed the poor.[36] Not enough is known about this institution in Borno, but it may have provided some support for at least the urban poor in Gazargamo and surrounding regions. Further evidence is necessary before one can speak of any widespread state distribution of food or grain, but the Sayfawa administration probably included a bayt al-mal. It may be through this institution that Ahmad b. Ali (r. 1791-1808) supported the scholars and worried about the plight of the poor.[37]

Through the galadima posted at Nguru, Borno also appears to have been largely successful on its western frontier with regards to vassal provinces and neighbors. A galadima at Nguru  named Dunama Aisatami overlapped with Dunama b. Ali’s reign. In his time as galadima, a praise song in his honor attributes the Islamization of the “pagans” of Garmangal to him. Furthermore, this galadima was the son of a princess of Hadija, or Mangu, another indication of effective creation of alliances by the galadimas responsible for Borno’s west.[38] A relatively successful galadima in western Borno who also oversaw the spread of Islam is consistent with Dunama b. Ali’s policies in Mandara and among the Bolewa of Daniski.

Furthermore, internal developments regarding Islam were far more nuanced than a simple “lack of support” for the ulama. The Koyam shaykhs of Gaskeru, for instance, were given that land with other benefits from Dunama b. Ali or his son, Hamdun. By supporting the return of this community, Dunama b. Ali was not only sponsoring the return of a Sufi ascetic community but strengthening Borno’s northern frontier. As the leaders of a theocratic mini state themselves, the Koyam built successful communities whilst defending Borno from Tuareg raiders or bandits. Their reputation for piety and asceticism attested to the lingering popularity of Sufi circles in Borno, including residents in Birni Gazargamo.

Dunama b. Ali’s Borno was also a center of Islamic scholarship. Shaykh Hajrami, who was active during this period, may have been an imam of one of Gazargamo’s Friday mosques. Several prominent Borno ulama are said to have studied in the circle of Shaykh Hajrami, such as Shaykh Tahir, Shaykh Umar Mama, and Shaykh al-Yamani. Hajrami was remembered for his lessons on the Mukhtasar of Sidi Khalil.[39] Another renowned scholar, Muhammad al-Kashnawi, studied in Borno during the early 1700s. In Borno, he studied with Muhammad K.R.’K. in Kaghu and Muhammad Bindu, learning calculation, math, logic, and the esoteric sciences. The learning of al-Kashnawi strongly implies an interest in esoteric sciences and mathematics among the ulama of Borno.[40] Indeed, this interest in topics like geomancy or astrology appears to have sparked the disapproval of Shaykh Hajrami and Muhammad al-Wali.[41] Borno’s continued function as a pole of attraction for Islamic scholars from areas as far as Bagirmi or Katsina in the late 1600s and early 1700s demonstrate a lively environment which was certainly supported by the state. As imam of one of the capital’s main mosques, Shaykh Hajrami, to take one example, would have been familiar with Dunama b. Ali and the Sayfawa administration.

Moving on to the elephant in the room, Shaykh Hajrami’s Shurb al-zulal. Interpreted by some scholars as a condemnation of corruption in Borno, the reality is certainly more complex. As previously mentioned, Shaykh Hajrami was active during the reign of Dunama b. Ali and possibly an imam of one of the main mosques of the capital. For Abubakar Mustapha, Hajrami’s poem was mainly an advanced lesson on fiqh for teaching the sources of halal and haram.[42] This view stresses the didactic purposes of the text rather than any attempt on social or political commentary. Nur Alkali, on the other hand, acknowledged the didactic purpose of the text while simultaneously leaving room for political commentary. Thus, Hajrami’s condemnation of the bribery of judges and gifts to governors, or ngaji and kabelo, could be read as a direct critique of Sayfawa administration. Basically, forms of taxation not in accordance with Islamic law and the corruption of judges or provincial government officials were at least implied.[43]

Bobboyi also adopted a similar perspective, with the Shurb al-zulal being insufficient itself to prove Hajrami was writing in response to real conditions in Borno. Nevertheless, the ulama were unlikely to have been writing a theoretical work completely removed from the local conditions or political arrangement of Borno. Shaykh Hajrami was also remembered in Borno tradition as an advisor who wrote an additional work on bidding good and forbidding evil, implying that he saw his works as didactic ones intended to teach proper actions in alignment with sharia and Islamic morality.[44]

A close analysis of the text is revelatory. In the translation of Bivar and Hiskett, which proposed a 1707 date for the composition, multiple intriguing questions manifest. Hajrami writes, “The root of legality is earning by husbandry and trade and industry, with piety and honesty in dealing and knowledge in seeking, and courteous behavior.”[45] This is hardly controversial, yet the work also condemns the eating of non-halal meat or food acquired through illegal or haram means. The condemnation of corruption by judges or the giving of gifts to governors refer to real-world practices, too. And to make his point even more forcefully, Hajrami writes, “And likewise your taking of dinars which have been seized unjustly, and dirhams taken forcibly.”[46] This importance attached to the illegal taxation and forcible seizure of goods may refer to conditions in Borno during the famine. If Hajrami wrote this after the famine, he may have witnessed or heard of many people in Borno suffering illegal taxation or expropriation of their surplus. After all, it is hard to imagine the chima gana or chima kura easily accepting to survive on herbs or plants and nuts from forests. It is possible that they sought to overtax and exploit the labor of the peasantry whenever possible, during the famine. This, undoubtedly, would have caused complaints by the rural population and discontent, which eventually reached Gazargamo. Consequently, Hajrami may have written Shurb al-zulal in response to those specific conditions of unrest and conflict engendered by the lengthy famine which struck the region.

On the other hand, the system of chima or “fief” administration always contained the seeds of corruption and exploitation. After all, the peasants in the chimas could be conscripted to provide communal labor, or surwa.[47] With the holders of the chima residing in the capital, their representatives appointed to oversee their “fiefs” could also seek ways to exploit or overtax the peasantry. The buying and selling of local positions through bribes or gifts to the representatives of the chima gana also includes many opportunities for corruption or illegal measures taken against the population.

In short, the system of Sayfawa administration as known for the last several centuries could easily lead to corruption or abuses of authority. To what extent was this the case during the reign of Dunama b. Ali remains an unanswerable question. If Hajrami was writing after or during the famine, that unquestionably shaped his view of the Sayfawa administration. Yet his own presence in Gazargamo and ties with ulama affiliated with the Sayfawa clearly establish him as an insider rather than a charismatic figure condemning the state from the exterior. Shurb al-zulal should be contextualized in this moment of duress and strain on the political economy of Borno during an extended famine. To speculate further on its condemnation of the Sayfawa administration is hasty without additional evidence.

Overall, Borno’s internal affairs during the reign of Dunama b. Ali were not an utter disaster. Instead of viewing his reign as one of unpopularity or lack of support for the ulama, a more nuanced perspective emerges. There were successes in terms of providing security, reducing banditry, and protecting (and taxing) trade routes for trans-Saharan trade. Furthermore, the relations with the ulama and the nurturing of Islam (including more ascetic forms) at this time point to a state inclined toward Islamic scholarship, governance, and legitimacy. The question of Hajrami’s Shurb al-zulal may be a critique of state practices during the lengthy famine period. It could also be intended to support the Islamic legal education of students in Borno

Conclusion

In conclusion, Dunama b. Ali’s reign marked one not marred by inexperience or failure. Borno was still a major power in the Central Bilad al-Sudan by 1715. Furthermore, its role in fomenting the spread of Islam and Islamic scholarship cannot be underestimated. Despite Muhammad Nur Alkali’s portrayal of him as an ineffective leader who was unpopular and failed to support the ulama, reconsidering the available evidence contradicts an overly negative assessment. Reappraising Dunama b. Ali requires one to consider all evidence, both oral traditions and written sources from Borno, North Africa, and Europe. When one does so, it is incredibly arduous to portray his reign as negatively as Alkali did. Besides the famine and ecological changes which the government could not control, Borno retained its position as a hegemonic power in this part of the world. It was only after 1715 where the failures of the Sayfawa maiwa to respond to the changing conditions in the Central Sudan threatened the dynasty’s survival. But it is difficult to imagine blaming Dunama b. Ali for these events. What emerges from the sources is the mai who dynamically created and responded to the problems and challenges that faced the state. This was a period in which the gains of the last few generations of Borno rulers were consolidated.



[1] The question of how Dunama b. Ali became mai is not clear. His brother died during his pilgrimage and was buried in Traghen, in the Fazzan. The report of Pétis de la Croix suggests that Idris b. Ali’s son returned to Borno when his father died. But, since this son did not succeed Idris, one must wonder if it was due to age or perhaps Dunama b. Ali was already poised to take the throne whilst his brother was expected to be away for several months. In addition, there was historical precedent for regents to seize the throne or rebel when the mai was on hajj for an extended period. A rebellion in 1667 against Ali b. Umar took place during this ruler’s pilgrimage. See Rémi Dewière, Du Lac Tchad à la Mecque. Le sultanat du Borno et son monde (xvie-xviie siècle) for more on this fascinating period in Borno’s history.

[2] See Muhammad Nur Alkali, Kanem-Borno Under the Sayfawa: A Study of the Origin, Growth, and Collapse of a Dynasty (891– 1846). For different interpretations of this mai, see H.R. Palmer, Bornu Sahara and Sudan.

[3] Ibid., 298-299.

[4] Ibid.

[5] See Dierk Lange, Le dīwān des sultans du (Kānem-)Bornū: Chronologie et histoire d'un royaume africain (de la fin du Xe siècle jusqu'à 1808), 81.

[6] H.R. Palmer, Bornu Sahara and Sudan, 252.

[7] John Lavers, “Kanem and Borno to 1808,” 203 in Obaro Ikime (ed.), Groundwork of Nigerian History . Whilst this may be interpreted as a sign of weakness by some, beginning cordial relations with Kwararafa was perhaps the more sensible approach. Since southward expansionism in that direction would have entailed lengthy and difficult campaigns and Borno’s rulers at this period wished to consolidate their gains and protect trade routes, Kwararafa as an ally or peaceful neighbor implied more secure trade routes.

[8] Dierk Lange, “Un document de la fin du XVIIe siècle sur le commerce transsaharien” in 2000 ans d’histoire africaine. Le sol, la parole et l'écrit. Mélanges en hommage à Raymond Mauny. Tome II, 678.

[9] S.W. Koelle, African Native Literature, Or Proverbs, Tales, Fables, & Historical Fragments in the Kanuri Or Bornu Language: To which are Added a Translation of the Above and a Kanuri-English Vocabulary, 208.

[10] Maikorema Zakari, Contribution à l'histoire des populations de Sud-Est nigérien: Le cas du Mangari (XVIe-XIXe s.), 56. On the relocation of a previous Fulani community at Gaskeru, see Landeroin, “Notice historique” in Documents scientifiques de la Mission Tilho.

[11] H.R. Palmer, Bornu Sahara and Sudan, 36.

[12] Bawuro M. Barkindo, The Sultanate of Mandara to 1902History of the Evolution, Development and Collapse of a Central Sudanese Kingdom, 132.

[13] H.R. Palmer, Gazetteer of Bornu Province, 97.

[14] H.R. Palmer, Sudanese MemoirsVol. 3, 28.

[15] To our knowledge, this title has not yet been analyzed or elucidated. That an elite woman occupied the position is significant, perhaps suggestive of an important post available to mairam women in the Sayfawa Period.

[16] H.R. Palmer, Bornu Sahara and Sudan, 37.

[17] For references to a sister of Idris Alooma’s sister accompanying him on his hajj, See Hadrien, Collet. “Royal Pilgrims from Takrūr According to ʿAbd Al-Qādir al-Jazīrī (12th–16th Century).” Islamic Africa 10, no. 1–2 (2019): 181–203. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26670347.

[18] H.R. Palmer, Bornu Sahara and Sudan, 53.

[19] “Consul de Maillet ad p. Ioannem Verzeau, S.I.” in Rerum aethiopicarum scriptores occidentales inedita a saeculo XVI ad XIX curante C. Beccari, S.I. vol. 14, 384. These Sayfawa maina brothers apparently told the French that the tomb of their grandfather was a celebrated and visited place. In addition, homes in Cairo, Medina and Mecca with boutiques to support pilgrims from Borno were also still operating. This implies that the maintenance of pilgrimage networks and Sayfawa funding for it were regularly active during the reign of Dunama b. Ali.

[20] See Dierk Lange, “Un vocabulaire kanuri de la fin du XVIIe siècle.” Cahiers d'études africaines, vol. 12, n°46, 1972. pp. 277-290. Among the terms included here are a number of ethnonyms referring to the Hausa, Katsina, Mandara, Ngizim, and Kwararafa (Kona) or other peoples with whom Bornoans were quite familiar.

[21] For an tentative look at the c. 1667 conflict between Borno and Kwararafa, see Behique Dunama, “Attacking Birni Gazargamo (c.1667),” https://thedreamvariation.blogspot.com/2025/07/attacking-birni-gazargamo-c1667.html.

[22] J.C. Zeltner, Tripoli, carrefour de l'Europe et des pays du Tchad, 1500-1795, 214.

[23] Ibid., 223.

[24] Palmer, H. R. “The Kano Chronicle.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 38 (1908), 88.

[25] Sa’ad Abubakar, “The Kwararafa Factor in the History of Kano” in Bawuro M. Barkindo (ed.), Kano and Some of Her Neighbours, 176.

[26] Richard Gray, “Christian Traces and a Franciscan Mission in the Central Sudan, 1700-1711.” The Journal of African History 8, no. 3 (1967), 385.

[27] S.W. Koelle, Polyglotta Africana or Comparative Vocabulary of Nearly Three Hundred Words and Phrases in more than One Hundred Distinct African Languages, 21.

[28] Barkindo, The Sultanate of Mandara to 1902, 132.

[29] Eldridge Mohammadou, Le Royaume du Wandala ou Mandara au XIXe siècle, 26.

[30] Barkindo, The Sultanate of Mandara to 1902, 145.

[31] Yusufu Bala Usman, “A Reconsideration of the History of Relations of Borno and Hausaland Before 1804”  in Yusufu Bala Usman & Muhammad Nur Alkali (eds.), Studies in the History of Pre-Colonial Borno, 200.

[32] Gustav Nachtigal, Sahara and Sudan Vol. 4, 280. Nachtigal’s chronology dates this sultan’s reign 1682-1722, but O’Fahey has suggested c. 1700-1720 in The Darfur Sultanate: A History.

[33] Theodor Krump, J. Spaulding (ed), The Sudanese Travels of Theodoro Krump.

[34] See Rémi Dewière, Du lac Tchad à la Mecque: Le sultanat du Borno et son monde (xvie - xviie siècle) for a detailed study of the Borno in the Early Modern World. Included in his analysis is the significance of hajj for the Sayfawa, which connected them not only with the wider Muslim world but brought great prestige for the dynasty within the Central Sudan.

[35] Hamidu Bobboyi, The 'Ulama of Borno : A Study of the Relations between Scholars and State under the Sayfawa, 1470-1808, 152.

[36] Robert Bouillé, Les coutumes familiales au Kanem, 196.

[37] Dierk Lange, Le dīwān des sultans du (Kānem-)Bornū: Chronologie et histoire d'un royaume africain (de la fin du Xe siècle jusqu'à 1808, 82.

[38] J.R. Patterson, Kanuri Songs, 21-22.

[39] Hamidu Bobboyi, The 'Ulama of Borno : A Study of the Relations between Scholars and State under the Sayfawa, 1470-1808, 20, 51.

[40] Louis Brenner, “Three Fulbe Scholars from Borno.” The Maghreb Review 10 no. 4-6 (1985), 107-109.

[41] Ibid., 110.

[42] Abubakar Mustapha, “The Contribution of Sayfawa Ulama to the Study and Administration of Jurisprudence,” paper presented in a conference on the Impact of Ulama' in Central Bilad al-Sudan (6-8 May 1991), 18.

[43] Muhammad Nur Alkali, Kanem-Borno Under the Sayfawa: A Study of the Origin, Growth, and Collapse of a Dynasty (891– 1846), 306-307.

[44] Hamidu Bobboyi, The 'Ulama of Borno : A Study of the Relations between Scholars and State under the Sayfawa, 1470-1808, 73-74, 94.

[45] A.D.H. Bivar and M. Hiskett, “The Arabic Literature of Nigeria to 1804: A Provisional Account.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 25, no. 1/3 (1962), 125.

[46] Ibid., 124.

[47] Hauwa Mahdi, “A Tentative Reconsideration of the Political Economy of Metropolitan Borno in the 18th and Early 19th Centuries.” Departmental Seminar, Saturday 29th Nov. 1980, Ahmadu Bello University Department of History, 6.

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

Iyat Idounia Ayasahen


Although we aren't huge fans of Bombino, we found this number to be one of the more interesting jams from Agadez. 

Monday, January 19, 2026

The Apogee of Agadez and the Zenith of Borno: Istambulawa-Sayfawa Conflict in the 17th Century


A passage from Girard's "Histoire chronologique du royaume de Tripoly de Barbarie" describing the pilgrimage of an Agadez prince.

            Although the conflict between the Sultanate of Aïr and Borno during the 17th century is well-known, reexamining its nature during the reign of Ali b. Umar of Borno (r. 1639-1677) and that of his son, Idris b. Ali (1677-1696) is worthwhile. This period happened to overlap the apogee of the Aïr Sultanate during the reigns of Muhammad al-Mubarak (1654-1687) and that of his son, Muhammad Agabba (1687-1721). During this era, the Sayfawa sultans of Borno were probably at their zenith, too, with Umar b. Ali and Ali b. Umar consolidating the gains of Idris b. Ali (r. 1564-1596). Aïr in this time was also in a period in which patrilineal succession occurred (from Muhammad al-Mubarak to Agabba). Additionally, territorial expansion through the incorporation of Adar developed at this period. Moreover, closer scrutiny of Aïr in this region reveals how economic, religious, and military factors made the Istambulawa sultans of Aïr rivals of the Sayfawa in the Central Sudan. In truth, these conflicts even reverberated in Tripoli, where Girard witnessed the quarrels of “blacks” from Agadez and Borno in the North African port. This essay shall examine each of these factors to contextualize how Sayfawa and Istambulawa competition arose through them. It will be demonstrated that the Istambulawa sultans were, at their apogee, regional rivals whose pilgrimages to Mecca, sponsorship of Islamic studies, fostering of trade ties to the Fazzan, and expansionist activities to the South were meant to challenge the hegemony of Borno in the Central Sudan.

Economic Factors

            First, the economic factors. Agadez had long been an important economic center for trans-Saharan trade. But the scale of it appears to have increased during the 17th century. For instance, Aïr began exporting senna to Tripoli by 1657, according to Girard.[1] This was cultivated within the region, suggesting gardens were established to increase production in the fertile areas of Aïr. Evidence also suggests the sultanate of Agadez was exporting horses to some of the Hausa states to the south, too.[2] In addition, Aïr possessed salines which were traded to Hausaland since the 15th century, if not earlier.[3] Naturally, Agadez was a major desert “port” for the export of gold and slaves from the south to North Africa, via the Fazzan and Ghadamis. Thus, economic development of the Hausa kingdoms to the south would have also favored Agadez as the northern “port” for Hausaland’s exports to North Africa and the Mediterranean. While this type of economic power was not the same as that of Borno, which at this time controlled Kawar (also a center for salt production and trade) but also large Sudanic lands where textile production, slave exports, and a larger agricultural surplus was attainable, Agadez’s commercial expansion and geographically favorable position made it an important site for trans-Saharan trade. Furthermore, growing ties between Agadez and the Fazzan during the 17th century may have partly undermined the economic influence of Borno. After all, if the Hausa kingdoms like Katsina, Kano, Kebbi, or Gobir were relying less on Borno’s controlled trans-Saharan route to the Fazzan, then Agadez was likely the one who benefitted as more commerce passed through Aïr to reach North Africa.

In addition, evidence of Agadez’s ties to the Fazzan and northern Africa during the 17th century can be found in Arabic documents from Ghadamis. Published and translated by H.T. Norris in Arabic Historical Literature from Ghādamis and Mali: Documents from the 18th to the 20th century, a major source is Tadhkīr an-Nāsī wa-Talyīn al-Qalb al-Qāsī (The Reminder of the Forgetful and the Softener of the Harsh). A biography of Shaykh ʿAbdallah b. Abī Bakr al-Ghadāmisī, it contains numerous references to his father and sons who studied in Agadez or became prosperous merchants in the city. For instance, the shaykh’s father, Sidi Abu Bakr, died in Agadez in 1641.[4] Another relative, Sidi Abu Bakr, was born in 1648 and traveled to Agadez with his father, Shaykh Abdallah. This was likely during the reign of Muhammad al-Mubarak, when this son of the shaykh became a prosperous merchant in Agadez favored by the sultan (likely al-Mubarak). According to the text, the Agadez sultan cherished him so much: “So his love for him grew in his heart.” He also went on the pilgrimage to Mecca three times. When he died in 1699, allegedly due to magic and sorcery, he was known for his success as a merchant.[5] His grandfather had also been known for his wealth, causing a jealous merchant to complain to the sultan about him possessing wealth that exceeded 40,000 mithqals.[6] Besides merchants from Ghadamis who were established in Agadez, the Fazzani merchants and scholars were established in the city. One family of Islamic scholars, the Barakila, were based in the city at this time.[7] The author of a remarkable diary that covers the second half of the 17th century, Abu Bakr b. al-Tahir Tashi, married a woman of Fazzani origin in 1689.[8] The numerous Fazzani and North African community based in Agadez was likely one of the reasons why Muhammad al-Nasir, of the Awlad Muhammad of the Fazzan, fled to Agadez in 1699. When he returned in 1700, al-Nasir also had Tuareg in his party.[9] This suggests that, despite Borno’s hegemony in Kawar and its long-standing ties with Tripoli, the dynasty in power in the Fazzan still looked to the west and southwest when in trouble. Agadez by the late 17th century was one area where many Fazzani merchants and Islamic scholars were based, and therefore a natural choice for fleeing sultans to find refuge. Overall, this concentration of Fazzani merchants and scholars in Agadez illustrates the emergence of an alternative Islamic-commercial hub that reduced Borno’s monopoly over trans-Saharan exchange.

Furthermore, the Kel Ewey Tuareg appeared to have enjoyed close relations with the sultans of Agadez in the 17th century. Indeed, Muhammad al-Tafrij, Muhammad al-Mubarak, and Muhammad Agabba may all have had Kel Ewey mothers.[10] While the era of Kel Ewey hegemony in Aïr is more easily attestable in the 18th century, the antecedents of their ascent may be traced to the 17th century. For example, Tuareg tradition suggests that al-Mubarak may have interceded on behalf of the Kel Ewey to force the Kel Gress to leave Aïr, leading to their migration to Adar and Gobir.[11] Although the evidence from the diary of Tashi reveals that the sultans were still occasionally threatened by conflict between the Kel Ewey and the Itisen, the Kel Ewey appear frequently in important political or economic contexts. For instance, Abu Bakr, the leader of the Kel Ewey, participated in the pilgrimage of Prince Aknafaya, a son of Muhammad al-Mubarak, in 1681.[12] Similarly, when Zamfara attacked the Kel Ewey in 1685, al-Mubarak immediately responded with a large force that included Abu Bakr and his Kel Ewey followers.[13] In light of the Kel Ewey’s reputation as traders and being more sedentary than other Kel Aïr, it is tempting to see their actions here as part of the economic interests of the Kel Aïr in trade and commerce with the lands to the south. The Kel Ewey factor here suggests that al-Mubarak and Agabba’s actions in Adar and Zamfara may have been at least partly motivated by a desire to support Kel Ewey trade and agricultural expansion.

In summary, economic factors related to commerce, trans-Saharan trade, and the trade routes that connected the Sudan to North Africa and the Mediterranean were part of Istambulawa competition with the Sayfawa. The growth of senna exports was another factor whilst the alliance between sultans al-Mubarak and the Kel Ewey, a group known for their commerce and sedentary agricultural settlements by the 18th century, likely favored the expansion of the sultanate into Adar and raids on lands claimed by Borno. The growth of ties between merchants and Islamic scholars in the Fazzan and Agadez appears to have increased during this era, presenting yet another challenge to Bornoan commercial hegemony as it deviated from the Lake Chad-Kawar-Fazzan-Tripoli route dominated by Borno. By aligning with a commercially oriented and increasingly sedentary Tuareg group, the sultans of Agadez also gained a social base that facilitated territorial expansion at the expense of Borno.

Factors of Faith and Spirituality

            Beyond trade, another dimension of Istambulawa-Sayfawa conflict during the 17th century was of a spiritual and religious nature. Although both were self-professed Muslim dynasties, the rulers of the Sayfawa also claimed caliphal status.[14] Moreover, the lineage of al-Mubarak and his successors may have also seen themselves as competitors for Islamic legitimacy with the powerful Sayfawa dynasty during this time. Take the hajj, for example. Ali b. Umar of Borno was known for performing the pilgrimage to Mecca several times. Indeed, he was said to have even founded homes in Cairo, Mecca and Medina with stores to support Borno pilgrims.[15] He was also known for his piety and support for scholarship. In the words of the Diwan, “C'était un homme courageux et un grand penseur.”[16] Even Girard, writing of Ali b. Umar based on his reputation in Tripoli, described him as someone “qui vivoit en opinion de sainteté parmy les Mahométans.”[17] Undoubtedly, Ali b. Umar and the Sayfawa dynasty’s known penchant for performing the pilgrimage enhanced their saintly reputation. In that light, it is interesting to note that a son of Muhammad al-Mubarak is known to have performed the pilgrimage at least three times.

Like the Sayfawa, the sultans of Agadez were also supposed to be pious, Islamic rulers. Without the status of caliphs, they developed the myth that their line began with Yunus, a prince from Constantinople. Though obviously a myth that lacks any historical accuracy, this origin myth turns the Kel Aïr sultans into children of another caliph, the Ottoman sultans. More likely, however, the institution arose as mediators of the Tuareg clans in Aïr, with Yunus being invited from the Sattafan country in Adrar-n-Ifoghas.[18] This region indicates possible origins in the marabout lineages of the Kel Tadamakkat, a region with deep Islamic roots and great influence in the lands of the Tuareg.[19] However, even the Istambulawa were said to possess a certain baraka and be related to the power of fertility.[20] In their victory against the jihad of Hadahada during the reign of Muhammad al-Tafrij, the Istambulawa were described by al-Hajj Muhammad b. Tighna in the following manner, “It is they who bring the evil to an end.”[21] Moreover, the same poem, written in response to Hadahada to criticize him for revolting against the sultan, also includes the following line: “Gratitude is a duty of a subject if the sultan acts justly, and patience is a duty if he acts unjustly.”[22] These aforementioned verses illustrate how the sultans of Agadez were perceived by at least some Islamic scholars of Aïr, as the source of justice and equality. It is thus very likely that Muhammad al-Mubarak, like his brother before him, saw his power similarly as a source of justice and one who must be obeyed. Like the Sayfawa, the Istambulawa claimed power through Islamic legitimacy. Lastly, both dynasties claimed origins from distant Islamic lands and a certain baraka.

            By looking at the practice of Islamic pilgrimage during the 17th century, one sees another element of the conflict over spiritual or religious status in the Central Sudan. The Sayfawa, a long-lasting dynasty with many mais who performed the pilgrimage, were already seen as Islamic and well-known in the Islamic world. The lineage of Muhammad al-Tafrij and Muhammad al-Mubarak, on the other hand, descended from a branch of the royal family which may have performed the hajj in the 16th and 15th centuries. According to Djibo Hamani, Yusuf, the father of Muhammad al-Tafrij and Muhammad al-Mubarak, was the son and grandson of men called al-Hajj. While these men may not have been from the royal family, the accession of Yusuf to the throne in 1594/5 may have benefited politically from this past of Islamic pilgrimages.[23] This tradition of hajj was maintained by the descendants of Yusuf, too. The most well-known case, that of Aknafaya, was a son of Muhammad al-Mubarak who performed the pilgrimage at least three times. On one of those occasions, in 1675, his second pilgrimage, he was briefly described by Girard as traveling in a group of 400 pilgrims and being “entièrement nègre.”[24]

While Ali b. Umar of Borno was described as traveling in a caravan of more than 2000 people in one of his later pilgrimages, this is nonetheless an important indication that the royal family of Agadez was known for undertaking the lengthy journey to Mecca.[25] By doing so, the rulers of Agadez were establishing or strengthening ties in the East and in North Africa whilst also enhancing their reputation as Islamic rulers. Unfortunately, internal politics within Aïr may not have been stable enough for a reigning sultan to make the pilgrimage himself, but members of the royal family doing so could still present an image of Aïr as an Islamic state.  These numerous pilgrimages of Aknafaya at a time when Borno’s ruler was known for his several “flights” to Mecca and Egypt could hardly have been coincidental. It is possible that al-Mubarak wanted to challenge the primacy of Borno by sending his son on the hajj several times. Even into the early 18th century, an unnamed Tuareg “prince” returning from hajj in 1710 was met by Fr. Carlo in Traghen.[26] It is thus conceivable that members of the royal family in Agadez continued this tradition with at least one of the sons of Muhammad Agabba making the pilgrimage. We strongly suspect part of this was politically motivated to elevate the reputation of the Istambulawa and demonstrate their status as peers with the Sayfawa.

            Furthermore, the status of Aïr in terms of Sufism within the Sudan and beyond is well-attested in this period. In fact, Ahmad al-Yamani of Arbaji, in modern-day Sudan, traveled to Aïr and Borno in the 1660s. Whilst his time at the second Kalumbardo settlement in Borno is well-known, the fact that he also studied in Aïr with Shaykh Ahmad al-Sadiq b. al-Shaykh Uways is significant. According to the Nashr al-Mathani, this man’s zawiya was widely celebrated. He died in 1679/80, and promoted the Suhrawardiya.[27] It is also said that the leader of the second Kalumbardo center, Abdallah al-Barnawi, studied under Shaykh Ahmad al-Sadiq.[28] This close association between Islamic mysticism in Aïr and the mystic school of Kalumbardo suggests that Sufi networks connected both Aïr and Borno. If the sources are credible, Abdallah al-Barnawi was perhaps influenced by Aïr Sufi traditions and perhaps Sidi Mahmud al-Baghdadi. In fact, this may also elucidate why the only time al-Yamani saw al-Barnawi upset was when a disciple wished that God destroy the Tuareg. In the words of Nashr al-Mathani, al-Barnawi replied, “Ne reste pas devant moi.”[29] This was allegedly said even though the Immakitan Tuareg raided Kalumbardo and were ultimately responsible for the destruction of the second community when they killed al-Barnawi in 1677/8.[30] The words of the shaykh only make sense if one seriously considers the possible influence of Aïr Sufi networks on his community, with evidence of similar practices of the followers of al-Baghdadi in Aïr and the Kalumbardo community as described by oral tradition.[31]

Naturally, that Aïr was known for its Sufi leaders such Ahmad b. al-Sadiq as far away as the Sinnar Sultanate and Morocco suggests the region was very much on the map of broader currents of Islamic mysticism in the 17th century. Since Kalumbardo was influenced by that tradition, Islamic mysticism may have been yet another expression of Istambulawa patronage for religion and an assertion of the sultanate’s status in the Muslim world. Aïr not only attracted students from as far as riverine Sudan, but also Fazzani scholars such as the Barakila.

A map of Agadez in the 1500s and 1600s mapped on the modern city in Djibo Hamani's Au carrefour du Soudan et de la Berberie, le Sultanat Touareg de l'Ayar.

            Finally, the military conflicts and raiding between the Kel Aïr and Borno during the second half of the 1600s were another arena for competition over religious legitimacy and leadership. According to a 1658 document translated by H.R. Palmer, Ali b. Umar launched an expedition against the Tuareg in response to the complaints of a woman who lost a grass cover of her calabash in Aïr. This conflict could be the one that took place between Borno and Aïr after the return of Ali b. Umar from the hajj in 1656, when Girard wrote that Borno had intense wars with Agadez and “Ethiopie” at this time (probably Kwararafa).[32] Nonetheless, the account translated in Bornu Sahara and Sudan, entitled “An Account of N’Gazargamu” by Palmer, mentions Ali b. Umar leading 1000 cavalry in an attack against the Kindin of Ahir, who were led by Ada Hamma.[33] This episode is difficult to interpret, but it appears to be an expedition launched in response to raids by the Kel Aïr. If the Bornoan source is reliable, the ruler of the Aïr was named Ada Hamma, which is contradicted by all other sources. However, the name Hamma is frequently found among the Tuareg.[34] Similarly, the diary of Tashi refers to a military leader named Amma Fatim in the attack against Borno in 1679, although his full name was Muhammad b. al-Hajj Ibrahim. In the second expedition against Zamfara in 1685, the leader was named Yusuf, nicknamed Addabab.[35]

Consequently, the Ada Hamma named in the 1658 Borno source could have been a Tuareg military leader but perhaps not Muhammad al-Mubarak himself. But most intriguing in Ali b. Umar’s victory against this Tuareg leader is the imposition of Islamic faith on the vanquished. After agreeing to convert to Islam, Ali b. Umar spared the Kindin leader. He also left 4 mua’llims with him.[36] Despite the implausibility of a Tuareg leader in the 1650s not knowing what Islam was, the narrative does suggest that Ali b. Umar saw the expedition as one that was legitimate based on Islamic concepts of holy war. The leaving behind of Islamic scholars with the Tuareg leader is an indication of this, as they would presumably have ensured proper Islamic practice of Ada Hamma. Furthermore, the leaving behind of a slave of the mai, Shakiralla, may have been done to ensure the loyalty of Ada Hamma after his capture. Overall, the military victory of this campaign, which included captives (some 1000 were given to the woman who complained to the mai), was partly defined as religious with Ali b. Umar promoting Islam among defeated or conquered peoples.

In the context of our known sources, it is likely this was merely a victory against one of the Kel Aïr factions, although further investigation is required to better establish a chronology of military engagements between the Kel Aïr and Borno during the period from 1639-1677. Nevertheless, it indicates a moment in which the Sayfawa used Islam to legitimize their victory against the Kel Aïr, who at the time also proclaimed their own Islamic legitimacy. Naturally, subjects of the rulers of Agadez contested the legitimacy of the Sayfawa. In fact, according to Girard, they mockingly referred to Ali b. Umar as “Sultan el Gatous,” due to the widespread belief that the mai could transform into a cat. Instead of seeing it as an example of his virtue (the cat was allegedly Muhammad’s favorite animal), it became a way to mock Borno’s ruler by subjects of Aïr in Tripoli.[37] Yet through framing frontier warfare as religious correction, the Sayfawa positioned themselves as Islamic arbiters over Tuareg groups whose sultan claimed similar legitimacy.

            Overall, religion and spirituality were a major factor in Istambulawa-Sayfawa conflict. By engaging in multiple pilgrimages, al-Hajj Aknafaya, a son of Muhammad al-Mubarak, was likely “competing” with the Sayfawa who were well-known for undertaking the pilgrimage. By going multiple times, this Agadez prince was probably trying to match the reputation of Ali b. Umar and his dynasty. In addition to strengthening the Istambulawa’s Islamic credentials and status, the pilgrimages increased contacts with other parts of the Muslim world. Besides the hajj, Sufi centers and Islamic scholarship in Agadez and other parts of Aïr attracted students from abroad. Their reputation further enhanced the reputation of the Istambulawa as patrons of Islam just as the Sayfawa were known for doing so through their own patronage of Islamic scholarship and piety. The links between Kalumbardo and the Aïr region are another element of this connection, with the Sufi Ahmad b. al-Sadiq functioning as a teacher of Abdallah al-Barnawi. In terms of Islamic mysticism and Sufism, which existed in Borno long before this period, Aïr may have been one of the influences upon the famous Kalumbardo center’s ideology and practices. As dynasties who also claimed exotic origins (though the exact chronology for the development of the Istambul myth for Agadez is ambiguous) and religious legitimacy, the commercial and military expansion of Aïr at this time undoubtedly butted heads with the Islamic credentials of Borno.

Military Factors

            Unsurprisingly, military factors related to raiding, war, and the acquisition of territory were also part of the competition between the Sayfawa and Istambulawa. Thanks to Girard, the 1658 source on Gazargamo, a praise song to a yerima said to have been a grandson of Ali b. Umar, and the journal of Tashi, a tentative chronology for some of the raids and wars is possible. Revisiting each of these sources on the wars and raids sheds another light on the political conflict between the two dynasties in the Central Sudan.

The aforementioned conflict between Ali b. Umar and the Tuareg led by Ada Hamma, for instance, should have taken place before or by 1658. That timing overlaps with the return of Ali b. Umar from the hajj in 1656 and wars with the Tuareg and Kwararafa. According to the 1658 text, Ali b. Umar also left a garrison at an unnamed place to defend the frontier, including many horses. To the people he left behind, he said, “May God bless you. Remain here.”[38] Though very fragmentary, the evidence suggests Ali b. Umar left behind forces to defend Borno’s northwestern frontier. This 1658 source is one of the few written ones to directly attest to Ali b. Umar’s frontier policy. It may also have been the conflict recalled in traditions of the Kel Férouan disobeying the sultan of Agadez when they refused to participate in the defense of Aïr against an invasion from Borno. Known previously as the “Bâton du Sultan” for always supporting the Istambulawa, they chose to not resist Borno at a time after the Kel Gress were already defeated (and presumably pushed to migrate south).[39] If this took place during the reign of al-Mubarak, it may have the 1658 conflict in which the Kel Férouan decided not to resist.

Understandably, the concern for defending Borno’s frontier from Tuareg raids and attacks was a significant consideration for the Sayfawa, who supported the creation of several buffer states at Muniyo, Kutus, Damagaram, and the use of Koyam communities to defend Borno’s heartland. Oral tradition from the Jetku or Jetko, for instance, recall migration to a Tal on the road to Dirku, north of N’guigmi. They apparently paid tribute to Mai Arri, who told them to stay at Tal to watch the Kindin.[40] The Mai Arri very well could have been Ali b. Umar, whose government planned to use the Jetku to guard the northern borders of Borno. Subsequently, the Jetko were under the administrative care of the tshiroma of Borno, indicating that the heir-apparent to the mai was given responsibility for the important Tell District north of the Komadugu.[41] This area, one of the many in which concern was shown for protecting the border from Tuareg raids, was also essential for protecting access to Kawar and northern trade routes to the Fazzan. Clearly, the yerima and to a lesser extent, the tshiroma, were expected to oversee Borno’s frontier defenses against dynamic Tuareg pressure which challenged Sayfawa authority.

Perhaps something similar occurred in Muniyo, where Kazelma Saemi, a Mandara prince, was sent to aid a chief named Gamagama against the Tuareg.[42] Zakari Maikorema believes this took place sometime in the late 1600s, possibly around the same time that the chiefly lineage of Kelle began with Atari Goumsoumi in Kutus.[43] The Sayfawa patronage of these smaller states as buffers between Borno’s central provinces and external foes like the Kel Aïr or Tuareg bandits further strengthened the image of the Sayfawa as protectors of these far-flung territories whose rulers sent tribute. With the aid of the yerima based in Gazargamo, oversight of these northwestern provinces bordering Aïr would have likely been closely watched.

But returning to documented conflicts, the best-known war between Agadez and Borno took place after the return of Ali b. Umar from his hajj in 1667. In this war, rebels of Borno sought aid from the ruler of Agadez in their attempt to seize the throne. Unfortunately for the rebels, the Sayfawa mai returned from the pilgrimage and was able to drive the forces of Agadez outside the kingdom.[44] The question of whether Kwararafa also attacked Gazargamo at the same time as the Tuareg besieged the capital is still unresolved. Barth, presumably relying on oral tradition, believed the attack from both groups took place at the same time.[45] The Gazetteer of Muri Province edited by Fremantle also supports this narrative, with the Kwararafa ruler, Katakpa, named as the one who launched the attack from Puje. Yet Ali b. Umar’s forces were able to convince the Tuareg army on the north side of the city’s walls to join them in an attack against Kwararafa.[46] Whether or not the Kwararafa attack on the capital really took place at the same time as the assault by the Tuareg and local rebels requires far more scrutiny to verify. But it indicates the most dramatic moment of Aïr-Borno conflict in the century. For the first time, Aïr soldiers were stationed directly outside Gazargamo and threatened to overrun the city.

The next documented military expedition, of 1679, was probably launched from Dabak. Led by Amma Fatim and including the Kel Ewey, “They seized children, herds and possessions, then the Sultan returned homewards.”[47] The reference to herds here and the date of the attack place it during the reign of Idris b. Ali. It is rather tempting to link this raid with the Kanuri praise song to a yerima. Translated by J.R. Patterson and entitled “Song to the Yerima,” it praises the yerima named Mohammadu. During his lifetime, a raid from “Sultan Ali whose country is Aïr” came to take away cattle from the land of Digima, a region under the care of the yerima.[48] It is very likely that Patterson mistranslated the song or perhaps the original verses are corrupted, since it names sultan Ali even though there was no sultan in Agadez called by such a name. It is possible the text mistranslated or garbled the name of the Aïr ruler, confusing him with Ali b. Umar of Borno, the grandfather of the yerima. Anyway, the song’s reference to the Fulani whose cattle were the target of the Tuareg is consistent with the 1679 expedition’s return from Borno with large herds. Moreover, the yerima, according to Nachtigal, was responsible for watching the southeastern Tuareg to protect the country.[49] The office of digima, mentioned in the song, was responsible for looking after the correspondence of the king of Borno. Nachtigal believed that his administrative territory in the days of the Sayfawa covered the royal residence, but in the 1870s, was Demagarim and neighboring areas.[50] This raises the question of a possible anachronism in the text of the praise song to Mohammadu, but chronology is consistent with the 1679 expedition led by Amma Fatim. In the praise song, Aïr only sent 70 horsemen to attack, strongly suggesting a small raid that struck somewhere on the northwestern borders of Borno.

Conclusion

In summation, the conflicts between the Istambulawa and Sayfawa during the second half of the 17th century were complex, multifaceted issues of regional importance. Economically, the growth of Agadez and Hausaland’s commercial centers, as well as the burgeoning power of the Kel Ewey, presented a threat to Borno’s hegemony in the Central Sudan. Close ties between Agadez and the Awlad Muhammad of the Fazzan, plus Fazzani traders and scholars based in Agadez illustrate this increased scale of commerce and cultural exchange. In addition to their economic considerations, the religious or spiritual factors also contributed to rivalry between the two dynasties. The Sayfawa, ancient and reputed for saintliness, were also confronted by the Istambulawa whose members engaged in the pilgrimage (sometimes more than once). Aïr sultans also presented themselves as legitimate Muslim rulers who promoted Islamic study, welcomed scholars, and were known to rule a domain that included illustrious shaykhs. To some extent, Aïr Sufi practices and ideology even reached as far as Sinnar and certainly shaped the second Kalumbardo settlement led by Abdallah al-Barnawi. While Ali b. Umar still asserted Bornoan Islamic legitimacy and even presented the Aïr Tuareg as pagans in need of his tutelage, the subjects of the Agadez sultan rejected this. Last, but certainly not least, the economic expansion of Aïr and its own internal dynamics led to more Tuareg clans migrating south and invading or raiding parts of the Central Sudan. The conquest of Adar, for instance, was only one aspect of Asben’s interference in the affairs of Hausaland. With the addition of new lands for herds and sedentary farming communities to exploit through tribute obligations, some Tuareg groups were able to transition gradually into sedentary or merchant groups with increasing ties to the Hausa trading centers. Perhaps the roots of the Kel Ewey hegemony in Aïr during the 18th and 19th centuries owes much to this early 17th century moment of Kel Ewey alliances with the sultans of Agadez. With territorial acquisitions in the south, the stage was set for further commercial development and power that, ultimately, did not require the Istambulawa anymore. But, for about 50 years, the Istambulawa truly were rivals to the Sayfawa.



[1] Girard, Histoire chronologique du royaume de Tripoly de Barbarie in R. Dewière, L'esclave, le savant et le sultan: représentations du monde et diplomatie au sultanat du Borno (XVIe-XVIIe siècles). Histoire. Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - Paris I, 2015.

[2] Moise Landeroin, “Notice Historique” in Documents scientifiques de la Mision Tilho, 483. According to one tradition, a young Muhammad Agabba went to Kebbi to sell horses to the Kanta.

[3] H.R. Palmer, “Kano Chronicle,” 76.

[4] H.T. Norris, Arabic Historical Literature from Ghadamis and Mali, 23-24.

[5] Ibid., 61.

[6] Ibid., 56.

[7] Ibid., 78, 170.

[8] H.T. Norris, The Tuaregs: Their Islamic Legacy and Its Diffusion in the Sahel, 84.

[9] H.W. el-Hesnawi, Fazzan under the Rule of the Awlad Muhammad. A Study in Political, Economic, Social and Intellectual History, 137, 101.

[10] K.S. Vikør, The Oasis of Salt: The History of Kawar, a Saharan Centre of Salt Production, 202.

[11] C. Jean, Les Touareg du Sud-Est: l'Air: leur rôle dans la politique saharienne, 92.

[12] H.T. Norris, The Tuaregs, 80.

[13] Ibid., 81.

[14] H.R. Palmer, Bornu Sahara and Sudan, 31

[15] Rerum aethiopicarum scriptores occidentales, Vol. 14, 384.

[16] Dierk Lange, Le dīwān des sultans du (Kānem-)Bornū: Chronologie et histoire d'un royaume africain (de la fin du Xe siècle jusqu'à 1808), 81.

[17] Girard, in Dewière, 600.

[18] H.T. Norris, The Tuaregs, 52-53.

[19] Djibo Hamani, Au carrefour du Soudan et de la Berbérie: Le sultanat touareg de l'Ayar, 138-139.

[20] Nicolaisen, Ecology of the Pastoral Tuareg, 416.

[21] H.T. Norris, The Tuaregs, 129.

[22] Ibid., 133.

[23] Djibo Hamani, Au carrefour, 225.

[24] Girard, in Dewière, 607.

[25] Ibid., 602.

[26] Richard Gray, “Christian Traces and a Franciscan Mission in the Central Sudan, 1700-1711.” The Journal of African History 8, no. 3 (1967), 386.

[27] Mouhammad Al-Qâdirî, Michaux-Bellaire, Édouard (trad.), Nachr al-Mathânî, II, De l’an 1051 (1641J.-C.) à l’an 1100 (1688 J.-C.), 308-309.

[28] John Lavers, "Diversions on a Journey of the Travels of Shaykh Ahmad al-Yamani," in The Central Bilād Al-Sūdān: Tradition and Adaptation : Essays on the Geography and Economic and Political History of the Sudanic Belt: Proceedings of the Third International Conference of the Institute of African and Asian Studies, University of Khartoum, Held from 8 to 13 November 1977, 225.

[29] Mouhammad Al-Qâdirî, Nachr al-Mathânî, II, De l’an 1051 (1641J.-C.) à l’an 1100 (1688 J.-C.), 253.

[30] Ibid., 258.

[31] Behique Dunama, “Shaykhs of the Koyam and the Legacy of Kalumbardo,” https://thedreamvariation.blogspot.com/2024/05/shaykhs-of-koyam-and-legacy-of.html and “Revisiting Sufi Mystics of the Niger Desert,” https://thedreamvariation.blogspot.com/2024/01/revisiting-sufi-mystics-of-niger-desert.html

[32] Girard, in Dewière, 604.

[33] H.R. Palmer, Bornu Sahara and Sudan, 35.

[34] Dierk Lange, Diwan, 98.

[35] H.T. Norris, The Tuaregs, 80-81.

[36] Palmer, Bornu Sahara and Sudan, 35.

[37] Girard, in Dewière, 620.

[38] Ibid.

[39] C. Jean, Les Touareg du Sud-Est, 96.

[40] H.R. Palmer, Sudanese Memoirs Vol. 3, 34-35.

[41] Gustav Nachtigal, Sahara and Sudan Volume 2, 252.

[42] Landeroin, “Notice historique,” 404.

[43] Maikoremi Zakari, Contribution à l'histoire des populations du Sud-Est nigérien: le cas du Mangari (XVI-XIXe s.), 114. Although Maikoremi argued that the chiefly dynasty of Kutus was founded before the second half of the 17th century, Landeroin argued that the founders of both the ruling lineage of Muniyo and Kutus overlapped (“Notice historique,” 419.

[44] Girard, in Dewière, 604.

[45] Heinrich Barth, Travels and Discoveries in North and Central Africa: Being a Journal of an Expedition Undertaken Under the Auspices of H.B.M.'s Government in the Years 1849-1855Vol. 2 (1857), 598.

[46] J.M. Fremantle (editor), Gazetteer of Muri Province, 35.

[47] H.T. Norris, The Tuaregs, 80.

[48] J.R. Patterson, Kanuri Songs, 13.

[49] Gustav Nachtigal, Sahara and Sudan, Vol 2, 250.

[50] Ibid., 250, 252.