Tuesday, September 2, 2025
The Khmers
Thursday, August 21, 2025
Cambodian History Timeline
The following is very much a work in progress on the history of Cambodia and the Khmer. The dates are largely based on the works of Roe, Lowman, Coedes, Chandler, and Liam C. Kelley. We hope to update this and further explore the fascinating history of this corner of mainland Southeast Asia at a future date.
245-250: Arrival of first Chinese envoys in Funan
357: Funan reported in Chinese sources to have offered to send tame elephants to China
514: Death of King Jayavarman
517: Envoy to China from Rudravarman
519: Envoy from Funan to China in 519
530: Envoy from Rudravarman to China in 530
535: Envoy from Rudravarman to China in 535
539: Envoy sent to China from Rudravarman
612: First (known) inscription in Khmer at Angkor Borei
616/17: Chinese reports of Chenla, former vassal of Funan now dominant
638: 4 embassies from the northwest of Khmer territory came to China
667: Inscription near Ba Phnom: shows 4 generations of an official family serving 5 kings (Rudravarman, Bhavavarman, Citrasena-Mahendravarman, Isanavarman, and Jayavarman I)
671-695: Chinese monk I-ching/Yi-tsing traveled in Southeast Asia
706: Split between Water Zhenla and Land Zhenla said to have taken place
770: First inscription of Jayavarman II
802: Beginning of Angkor period with Jayavarman II
817: Cham inscription in Sanskrit mentions their victory against Cambodia
851: The merchant Sulayman said to have traveled to Southeast Asia, heard tale of "Java" (Maharaja of Zabaj) defeating a Khmer king
877: Reign of Indravarman of Cambodia attested
889-c. 910: Reign of Yasovarman I
928-941: Reign of Jayavarman IV
944-968: Reign of Rajendravarman. Centralization of Khmer realm may have developed during his reign
950: Rajendravarman raids Champa, taking a gold statue from the temple at Po Nagar
1002-1050: Reign of Suryavarman I
1011: Loyalty oats to Suryavarman I inscribed on stone
1025: Inscription from reign of Suryavarman near Lopburi
1050-1066: Reign of Udāyadityavarman II, who built the Baphuon
c.1052: Sdok Kak Thom Inscription
1056: Cham raid of Sambhupura
1066-1080: Reign of Harshavarman III
1113-1150: Reign of Suryavarman II, builder of Angkor Wat
1115: Arrival of a tribute mission from Lopburi to China
1120: Tribute mission from Zhenla to China
1166/7: Reign of usurper from Lopburi at Angkor, Tribhuvanādityavarman
1171: A mandarin from Fukien landed on the coast of Champa, and said to have shared military expertise to help Chams defeat Angkor
1177: Fall of Angkor to Cham forces, led by Jaya Indravarman IV
1182: Reign of Jayavarman VII began
1190: Jayavarman VII's invasion of Vijaya
1243- 1295: reign of Jayavarman VIII
1282/3: Chinese records of a mission from Xian (Siam)
1296: Śrī Śrīndravarman became king of Cambodia
1296-7: Zhao Daguan visited Angkor
1351: Foundation of Ayutthaya
1369: Angkor temporarily abandoned (Mabbett)
1431: Letter cited by Liam Kelley indicating Siamese overthrow of the ruler of Sanfoqi (Cambodia?)
c.1570-1594: Reign of Sattha, who was well-disposed to Europeans. Was interested in an alliance with the Spanish and Portuguese
1570s: Cambodian king may have temporarily transferred the court to Angkor
1583: Thai attack on Longvaek
c.1585-1586: Spanish priest Antonio de Magdalena visited Angkor
1587: Thai unsuccessfully besieged Longvaek
1594: Thai sacking of Cambodian capital, Longvaek
1594-1597: Reign of s Ram Jerng Prei
1603-1618: Reign of Paramaraja IV
1618-1627: Reign of Jai Jettha II
1623: Vietnamese ask for a customs post at Prei Nokor (Saigon)
1642-1659: Reign of Ramadhipati I, who converted to Islam and was overthrown in 1659.
1672-1673: Reign of Padumaraja II
1680s: by this time, the future Saigon was seized by the Vietnamese from the Khmer
1747: Rebellion led by a daughter of Ang Im
1772: Phnom Penh destroyed by Thai/Siamese army
1775-1779: Reign of Ang Non III
1820: Revolt against Vietnamese led by a monk, Kai
1836: Revolt of Kom Svay against Vietnam
1860-1904: Reign of Norodom
1936: Appearance of a Khmer language newspaper called Angkor Wat
Saturday, August 9, 2025
Angkorian "Nation"
Saturday, August 2, 2025
A History of Cambodia
Friday, July 11, 2025
Angkor & the Khmer Civilization
Thursday, July 18, 2024
Sanfoqi as Angkor/Cambodia
Saturday, August 12, 2023
Southeast Asia's Critical Crossroads
Tuesday, July 25, 2023
The Indianized States of Southeast Asia
George Coedès was one of the major historians of Southeast Asia. Due to his stature in the field and importance in the study of Cambodia and Srivijaya, reading The Indianized States of Southeast Asia felt like a requirement. And despite being somewhat outdated and reflecting an older worldview and approach to historical research, Coedès wrote a very reasonable survey of Southeast Asian history based on contemporary scholarship. Of course, it was almost inevitable that the legacy of European colonialism shaped how Coedès conceived of Indianization. Although Indians did not conquer and found states in Southeast Asia, local elites adopted aspects of Indian culture or intermarried with Indians through a process unfortunately little known or understood. Nonetheless, Coedès viewed this as Indians civilizing Southeast Asians, who would have otherwise been as unknown historically as New Guinea and Australian Aboriginal populations. Hindu and Buddhist civilization, Indian-derived scripts, mandalas and the laws of Manu provided the basis for the efflorescence of various Southeast Asian states from Funan and Lin-yi to Siam and Majapahit.
Somehow, despite his own evidence to the contrary, the author wants us to believe Southeast Asia never made any major contribution to the world and actually declined as Indianization was replaced by Islam or weakened by local cultures (the latter particularly fueled by Theravada Buddhism). This stance is definitely counter to that of more recent scholarship, which stresses local agency in the adoption of Indian culture and the role of Southeast Asians in promoting and facilitating trade in the Indian Ocean. In some respects, it reminds us of the debates on the Swahili culture of East Africa or even the kingdoms and states of Sudanic Africa and trans-Saharan trade. Colonial scholars of both Southeast Asia and Sudanic Africa sometimes approached the peoples of the two regions as empty receptacles for the "advanced" cultures and civilizations of other regions. Southeast Asia, however, was undeniably important in "Old World" exchange before most of sub-Saharan Africa. Nonetheless, we cannot help but think of the occasional parallels between both regions in their relations with the better-known civilizations to their north, the centers that allegedly "civilized" them (Islamic civilization of the Middle East and North Africa, India and China in the case of Southeast Asia).
As a basic synthesis of about 1500 years of SE Asian history, this work is a readable summary of the known knowledge on the subject. Much of it relies on inscriptions and references from Chinese annals or later local chronicles, so it is very much a history of royal courts, elites, and Hinduism and Buddhism at the aristocratic or political elite domain. It was undoubtedly adapted to meet local needs, and was often consistent or could be consistent with local animistic traditions and beliefs in spirits residing in mountains, ancestors, and deified kings (devaraja). That said, the numerous gaps in our knowledge and the struggle to piece together a coherent narrative out of the sources then available made for sometimes speculative interpretations by Coedès. So much is unknown or guesswork based on what some inscriptions implied or how Chinese sources, which were not always reconcilable with local inscriptions or names, referred to such and such king or polity. The confused genealogies of kings, the role of matrilineal inheritance, and other factors also obscure royal genealogies and chronologies. That said, however, Southeast Asia's brilliant civilizations, such as Cambodia under the Khmer or Srivijiaya and the Sailendras at their zenith, bequeathed a glorious legacy to posterity through temples, monuments, canals, artificial lakes, and the arts, Coedès draws on the study of sculpture, literature, religious texts, and the other arts to supplement the other sources in a way that is admirable. One only wishes that the author had taken a bit more seriously the allegedly non-civilized masses or subjects and the hill peoples in the analysis for a fuller picture of how these states actually operated and integrated "Indianized" elites and commoners who may have not been influenced by Indianization until the spread of Theravada Buddism.
Friday, July 7, 2023
Southeast Asian History
Wednesday, November 9, 2022
Korea Under Japanese Rule
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
A History of Japan, 1334-1615
Wednesday, June 1, 2022
Japan: A Short Cultural History
George Bailey Sansom's Japan: A Short Cultural History is not short. Exceeding 500 pages, it condenses over 2000 years of Japanese history into a single book. Focusing on cultural developments in the arts, literature, religion, and learning, it unavoidably explores social, political, and economic contexts in various eras in Japanese history before ending in 1868. Since it was originally published in the 1930s, some chapters are outdated and one should probably consult more recent works for prehistoric and early historic Japan.
However, in spite of its occasionally outdated references and bizarre allusions to "racial" character, this is an enjoyable overview of Japanese Civilization from an old-school generation of British historians. We mean that in a positive way, by the way. There are chapters that also make the reader rethink their assumptions. The Sengoku Jidai period, for instance, was, according to Sansom, a period of economic growth and cultural development despite the warring and destruction. One also gets some semblance of the diverse sects of Buddhism in Japanese history and how Japanese responses to Chinese or other influences changed over time.
However, I think Morris was a bit more useful for breaking down Heian social structure while Leupp might be more enlightening on the urban laborers and shop hands of the Tokugawa era. In his defense, Sansom's book was first published in the 1930s and he was clearly in a league of his own when it came to Western historians with an interest in Japan. We will have to read the famous trilogy of Sansom next to see his more detailed analysis of Japanese history beyond culture and the arts.
Wednesday, November 3, 2021
The World of the Shining Prince: Court Life in Ancient Japan
Ivan Morris's study of the Heian era, particularly the 10th and 11th centuries when Murasaki Shikibu lived, is an excellent introduction to the period for anyone interested in Tale of Genji or Heian literature. Since we at the blog have read a few of the diaries and monogatari and poetry of the era, we were recommended Morris's study to ensure a great understanding of the cultural, social, historical, and literary contexts. And as an exploration of the Heian era, one begins to see how Japan, influenced heavily by Chinese civilization, Buddhism, and continental ideas, began to develop its literature in an insular way that looked to the past (T'ang dynasty China, for instance) while blending, in an eclectic fashion, Shinto, Buddhist and native traditions to reflect what Morris calls the cult of beauty. While not expecting the degree of isolation Morris attributes to the Heian era, it certainly helps explain how a unique and independent foray in prose fiction developed by the 10th century, and why women, in the peculiar context of this era, produced the most memorable literary works that perfectly capture the aestheticism of the age.
Everything in in the rather narrow worlds of the Heian aristocracy reflected this obsession with style and beauty, even as their world fell into decline as the Fujiwara-dominated government failed to contain provincial uprisings and the breakdown of law and order. If you're trying to learn more about how the economy functioned, or the lifestyles of the peasantry or artisans, this book won't help you very much. As Morris admits, the women (and male) writers of the Heian period looked at commoners at is they were barely human, and Murasaki Shikibu or Sei Shonagon rarely mentioned lower classes or discussed the economic basis for the wealth of the aristocrats of higher ranks. Yet one cannot help but admire Murasaki Shikibu and Sei Shonagon as talented, intelligent women who, despite enjoying a higher status than women in later periods of Japanese history, were still at a tremendous disadvantage in a polygamous and sexist world. And it is they who appear to represent the zenith of Heian civilization's literature while providing a testament to the cultural accomplishments of the Fujiwara-dominated period, even as Japan languished in other fields.
Wednesday, March 17, 2021
Madhav & Kama: A Love Story from Ancient India
A.N.D. Haksar's translation of the short tale Madhav & Kama: A Love Story from Ancient India is an interesting read for those interested in prose (or mostly prose) writings from the Sanskrit language. While differing from the literary standards of Dandin or works like Kadambari for its simplistic plot structure and avoidance of the excessively descriptive passages, the author of the original manuscript must have been aware of the earlier romance narratives in Sanskrit literature. Madhavanala Kamakandala Katha, unfortunately, lacks the excitement or engaging stories of Dandin. Here, a brahmin and a courtesan fall in love, consummate their relationship, are separated after a king banishes Madhav, and reunited after King Vikramaditya defeats Kama Sena. With the exception of being more sensual and erotic than, say, ancient Greek romances, this tale reads like a weaker, less developed version of a romance, akin to Ephesian Tale. Because it is a story from several centuries ago, divinities and miraculous events happen, such as the resurrection of the two lovers. It also extolls the importance of caste and merit, for both are necessary for the ideal individual. Again, hardly a surprise. We will have to revisit this text after reading more Sanskrit texts.
Tuesday, November 10, 2020
Asian Indians in Saint Domingue: An Early Indo-Caribbean Population
While researching the presence of indigenous peoples of the Americas in Saint Domingue, in an attempt to come to some kind of historical understanding of the relationship between "Amerindian" peoples and Haiti, one comes across numerous references to Asian Indians in the sources. Although their numbers must have been even tinier than those of free and enslaved indigenous peoples in the French colony, attempting to enumerate and study their presence in Saint Domingue highlights the global dimensions of French Empire in the 18th century. Moreover, the "East Indian" slaves and free people of color also push back the origins of the Indo-Caribbean, placing them deeper into the historical panorama of the region. This post will attempt a brief look at this minority of the captive population to see what it reveals about the nature of Saint Domingue, its heterogeneous enslaved population, and the global networks in the crown jewel of 18th century French colonialism.
First, one must begin with the origins of East Indian slaves. There is evidence that the Portuguese were already selling slaves from Goa and other regions of the subcontinent as early as the 16th century. Europeans were also bringing African or Asian slaves to serve in cities like Portuguese Goa, while also purchasing local Indians who were either sold by their families during times of famine or crisis or kidnapped by greedy local merchants. Relatively early on, Asian captives found their way to Europe and, likely, the Americas. Indeed, according to the work of Forbes, Asian Indian captives were present in Seville, Lisbon and other parts of the Iberian peninsula, alongside West African, North African, indigenous peoples from the Americas and Canary Islanders. The Dutch were also engaged in the slave trade in the East Indies, importing a large number of slaves from the coasts of India to the Cape Colony.
Moreau de Saint-Méry, Méderic Louis Élie. Description topographique, physique, civile, politique et historique de la partie françoise de l'isle Saint-Domingue. 3 vols. Philadelphia: 1797.
Shell, Robert Carl-Heinz. Children of Bondage: A Social History of the Slave Society At the Cape of Good Hope, 1652-1838. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 1994.
Wednesday, October 28, 2020
Indian Ocean Slavery
Friday, June 5, 2020
Tales of the Ten Princes
Tuesday, September 17, 2019
Thursday, August 22, 2019
The Chinese in the Dominican Republic
Thursday, August 15, 2019
The History of the Chinese in Haiti
However, it seems quite clear that any Chinese persons in Haiti before the late 19th century were very few. Despite the significant numbers of Chinese laborers next door in Cuba, some of whom also ended up in the Dominican Republic and Puerto Rico (not to mention the Chinese presence in Jamaica, which also began in the middle of the 19th century), Haiti was not able to attract Asian indentured laborers or entrepreneurs at this time. It was not due to a lack of interest, since some Haitians, such as A. Monfleury, saw a need for Asian laborers on plantations at least as far back as 1860. Frustrated and unable to launch long-term successful sugar plantations with the requisite compliant and cheap labor, Haiti consequently would have very few if any Asians. However, it is possible that some Chinese in nearby Cuba, Jamaica, or the Dominican Republic did end up in Haiti but are not mentioned in any local papers, especially if they were in the Dominican-Haitian borderlands during the War or Restoration. Imagine an indentured worker in Cuba seeking an escape, perhaps they may have heard of Haiti through Afro-Cubans?
If anything, the small numbers of Chinese in the neighboring Dominican Republic during this time indicate tiny or non-existent numbers of Chinese in Haiti. According to Graciela Azcárate, there was an increase in the Chinese population in the Cibao, Santo Domingo, and other regions, particularly after 1870. They worked on railroad construction and local industries in a migration promoted by Gregorio Riva. But by 1920, there were only 255 Chinese across the entire country, if the numbers are reliable. Most of these were men, often running laundry services, restaurants, and businesses in towns. As one would likely suspect, the numbers of Chinese in the DR increased during and after the US Occupation, but a 1950 census reported only 455. Azcárate's article does allude to migratory flows from the continental US and connections with Jamaica, which leads one to wonder if any of the Chinese families in Haiti have Dominican relatives. For instance, a Fong Sang became a naturalized Haitian citizen in 1951, and very well could be related to the Sangs in the Dominican Republic. Such a thing would not be surprising, as this pattern can be found among the Syrian and Lebanese families in the region.
Since it has been reasonably established that the Chinese communities in the Dominican Republic during this time were small in number, it is probable that Haiti received even fewer. In 1881, a Polish engineer mentioned an attempt by the owner of the Drouillard habitation in the Cul-de-Sac Plain to use Chinese laborers on the estate, even building housing for them. Grekowicz made it quite clear in his correspondence that this attempt to use Chinese labor, comprised of 5 or 6 unnamed families, failed as the Chinese were persecuted by locals and eventually chased off the property, later fleeing to Port-au-Prince. These unfortunate souls may have been the first Chinese in the nation. Grekowicz did not identify the proprietor of Drouillard, but Candelon Rigaud indicates it fell under the ownership of Achille Barthe and his descendants, perhaps already in the family hands by 1881. There may have also been a a few other Chinese who came in the 19th century via the British West Indies or French colonies in the region.
The first two decades of the 20th century appear to be the better date ranges for elucidating the origins of Chinese families in Haiti. Still, their numbers could not have been great. By the 1910s, there were at least a handful, particularly the Fong-Ging brothers and other Chinese restaurateurs, most likely all from Canton. According to Essud Fungcap, the Chinese were attracted to Haiti during the 1910s and 1920s because there was an increase in the demand for their services and restaurants during the US Occupation. This would explain why Juan Fong, Hoo Hing, the Wawas, Fungcaps and others could find a market for their services and prosper. Further, it indicates that the Chinese in Haiti must have been overwhelmingly urban, where they sold their services to US Marines, foreign residents, and the Haitian middle-classes and elites in Port-au-Prince, Cap-Haitien, Aux Cayes and, perhaps, other towns. Additional evidence from US Congressional documents reveal the presence of Chinese nationals in Haiti and the Dominican Republic in 1918, specifically authorizing US agents to issue passports for Chinese to return to their homeland via the US. There is no indication of their total numbers on the island, but clearly they were establishing shops and businesses in both countries in the 1910s. Corvington, whose well-known series on the history of Port-au-Prince, is an excellent resource for understanding the increase in the numbers of restaurants, diversions, and urban amenities in Port-au-Prince during the Occupation, in which these migrants played a role.
Although perhaps best known for contributions to the arts, the Chinese of the Black Republic connect Haiti to larger processes in the Caribbean. Unfortunately, it remains difficult to access information about how Chinese-owned businesses operated and co-existed with Haitian competitors (Le Nouvelliste covered a work stoppage at the Wawa laundry in 1947, involving the Bureau de Travail), but their story is an interesting example of US imperialism and burgeoning global markets shaping Caribbean development through middleman minorities. It is a history intimately tied to the US Occupation and urbanization. Given their small numbers, it may be unlikely they had tongs or any kind newspaper, but they may have been connected to Chinese Benevolent Associations in Jamaica or subscribed to Chinese-language papers from other parts of the Caribbean. Much labor remains to be done to understand the history of the Chinese in Haiti.





















