Sunday, January 4, 2026

The Cacicazgo of Maguana and Caonabo

The island on the Axis Mundi with San Juan de la Maguana as the center of the world (in ValméAtabey, Yucayequey, Caney : 6000 ans d'amenagement territorial prehispanique sur l'ile d'Ayiti / Haiti/ Republique Dominicaine).

Exploring the history of the cacicazgo of Maguana is exceedingly difficult. Since we only know of Caonabo, its leader at the time of Columbus's arrival in Hispaniola, speculation and the use of the meager details of his life are the best clues. In addition, the topography of the island, Maguana's relations with other cacicazgos and the traditions of Indian misterios which have survived in the region of San Juan de la Maguana are the other types of evidence one must consult. Besides these, the brief references in the Spanish chronicles and some of the encomienda system's records are most of what one can work with. We shall begin with the chronicles and Columbus, then shift to other types of sources to reconstruct a plausible theory for Maguana. Then, with a review of 20th century scholarship and more contemporary studies, we shall endeavor to understand the features of the Maguana chiefdom. It will be shown that Caonabo's political career and function as a stranger king made him well-poised to understand the threat posed by the Spanish to the balance of power. In truth, as a stranger who was able to achieve great political power and status, Caonabo understood better than anyone else why the Spanish were such a threat.

Non-Spanish Early Sources

First, the non-Spanish chronicles and histories. Moreau de Saint-Mery wrote that Maguana was bordered to its south by the sea, on its north by the mountain chains, on its east by the Jayna (Haina) River, and on its west by the mountains of Bahoruco.[1] For Charlevoix, the Jesuit historian, Maguana included the Cibao and its leader, Caonabo, was the most powerful monarch on the island. Supposedly, Maguana was able to, with the aid of its allies no doubt, muster 100,000 warriors led by Manicatex, a brother of Caonabo.[2] Cuneo, a much earlier source, attributed the total forces Caonabo capable of mustering to be 50,000, so one presumes Manicatoex was receiving reinforcements from a broader alliance.[3] Nau, the 19th century Haitian historian of the island's indigenous peoples, repeated the narrative of Caonabo's Carib origin. One of Maguana's provinces included Niti, too.[4] Unsurprisingly, Nau likely drew on the same sources as the earlier Francophone chronicles and texts. 

An anonymous Frenchman, who presumably drew on oral tradition, also wrote about Caonabo. In his case, the treasure of Caonabo was thrown in the river by a wife after she heard the god of the Spanish was gold. This lost treasure apparently consisted of 300 plaques of gold, 52 charges of gold, a throne (presumably a duho) and a gold table. Locals even reported that the treasure of Caonabo was still somewhere in this river.[5] However, the region around San Juan de la Maguana was perceived by some non-Spanish writers as a part of the island in which people with mixed-race Indian ancestry could be found.[6] So even into the 17th century, the area around San Juan de la Maguana had a partly recognizable indigenous heritage. Indeed, even Thomas Madiou reproduced a discourse by a commandant of San Juan de la Maguana from the 1820s which reiterated the notion of indigenous ancestry.[7] Last, but certainly not least, Robert Schomburgk visited the site of the Corral de los Indios, a ceremonial center that is often said to be the largest plaza in the Caribbean. Although Schomburgk referred to it as a "Cercado de los Indios," it is obvious he was referring to the same Corral.[8] Its tremendous size and the use of a rock with evidence for eyes and a mouth near the center of the plaza must have held some kind of cosmological or ritual significance. Despite their limitations, these pre-20th century French and English sources do give a sense in which indigenous traditions may have survived in the region of San Juan de la Maguana. Naturally, this could very well be part of the legacy of Maguana and provide possible clues to the region. Thus, the association of water with indigenous spirits in the region today could very well be an example of indigenous retentions.[9]

Spanish-Language Early Sources

Moving on to Spanish sources, the language of all the primary sources, scholars have additional details and more questions emerge. First, Columbus and others who visited Hispaniola in the 1490s provide the earliest written sources to mention Caonabo or areas allegedly part of his domains. For example, Columbus, who met Caonabo, referred to him as "a man advanced in years and of great knowledge and very keen understanding.”[10] This suggests that Caonabo was perhaps middle-aged or older by this time. He was not young or politically inexperienced, as Guacanagari of Marien may have been. In fact, Columbus's journal on the First Voyage likely alludes to parts of Caonabo's territory when referring to places east of Marien: Guarionex, Macorix, Mayonic, Fuma, Cibao, and Coroay.[11] It is highly likely that the Cibao was part of Caonabo's territory, and Mayonic could have been Columbus's garbled rendering of Maguana. In his other writings, Columbus similarly described interactions with Caonabo and the land of Maguana. For instance, he knew of "Cahonaboa" as "el cual posee tierra en que ay mucho oro.”[12] 

Elsewhere, in a memorial from 1494, Columbus referred to Caonabo as "que es ombre, según la relación de todos, muy malo e muy más atrevido.”[13] Clearly written during the period of conflict with the powerful native ruler, Columbus acknowledged the bold daring of Caonabo. This is why Columbus urged the sending of European gifts to Caonabo to help lower his guard. The giving of gifts was quickly understood by Columbus to be important in establishing close ties with the indigenous elite of the island. But on Maguana specifically, Columbus's writings report "y este Cahonabo dizen que en la tierra donde vive ay mucho oro mas es tierra muy montañosa."[14] Upon consideration of Caonabo's name, translated as "Lord of the Golden House" by Martyr d'Anghiera, the cacique's territory must have included gold-producing parts of the island. When he visited Maguana itself in 1495, Columbus noted the land's proximity to the sierras and its acequias or irrigation ditches, "como en Granada," to exploit the plentiful sources of water.[15] This reference to the use of irrigation canals or ditches is especially significant. Since the use of the same method of irrigation was used in Xaragua, whose leader at the time was a brother-in-law of Caonabo, one is tempted to consider a technological transfer from Xaragua to Maguana. Alternatively, both regions may have begun using irrigation systems much earlier. Regardless of the origin of this practice, it would have greatly increased the agricultural potential and provided higher population densities. This could explain the large number of houses in Maguana's central settlement, which Lynne Guitar claimed exceeded 1000.[16] 

In addition to Columbus, a plethora of other Spanish sources and chroniclers of the first half of the 16th century mentioned Caonabo and Maguana. For instance, Martyr d'Anghiera's De Orbe Novo gave a translation of Caonabo's name. Furthermore, based on Morales's map of Hispaniola and other sources, d'Anghiera located Maguana in Bainoa. Maguana itself was a valley through which the Bahaun River flowed. Caonabo's siege of Alonso de Ojeda in the Fort of Saint Thomas was also mentioned, including the bewildering tale of Caonabo's capture and imprisonment by Ojeda. Like Columbus, d'Anghiera also stressed that Caonabo ruled "Cipangu" (a misunderstanding on the part of Columbus for the Cibao, mistakenly identifying it with Japan). But with a much smaller estimate of warriors, Caonabo's brother was only able to gather 5000 men but they were defeated by the Spanish (with the brother's capture, too).[17] Ferdinand Columbus, the son of the Admiral, also referred to Caonabo in his biography of his father. In this case, it was to the enmity between Caonabo and Guacanagari as the former had stolen the wife of the other.[18] Although Columbus's son offered a different narrative of Caonabo's capture, the general picture is consistent with the other sources on Caonabo's destruction of La Navidad and conflict with the Spanish. Las Casas, on the other hand, provided a richer description of Maguana. For this author, Maguana was located near the Cibao and consisted of valleys, rivers, plains, and sierras. It was fertile, enjoyed a moderate temperature, and the Yaqui river passed through its territory. Maguana's name referred to the fact that it was a smaller vega than Maguá, the cacicazgo held by the family of Guarionex.[19] Las Casas even gives some dimensions for Maguana, cited by Sued-Badillo as being 30 leagues long and 25 leagues wide.[20] 

The other 16th century sources include Oviedo's Historia general y natural de las Indias and the records associated with the 1514 Repartimiento. Oviedo, who came to the island long after the demise of Caonabo, believed the cacique was of Carib origin. Moreover, he also saw the Ciguayos as subjects of Caonabo.[21] This seems unlikely if the Ciguayos were based in Samaná, closer to the territory of Guarionex. The 16th century records on the encomiendas of San Juan de la Maguana and other towns in c. 1514 also allude to some details on Maguana. Of the 1,435 Indians assigned to encomenderos there, some were the western part of the island. For example, a cacique named Baltasar de Higuamuco likely came from the territory Las Casas described as east of Guahaba. Others who likely came from the cacicazgo of Maguana in precolonial times were assigned to encomenderos in other towns. Thus, Hernando del Maguanabo, perhaps his name referring to "House of Maguana," was assigned to Diego de Ocampo in Bonao.[22] Although his following only consisted of 45 people, his name is highly suggestive of someone who may have hailed from the precolonial Maguana elite. Other familiar names among the indigenous leadership include Enrique, who later led a long-lasting revolt against Spanish authority from the Bahoruco Mountains. As the nephew of Anacaona, the wife of Caonabo, his presence in the Bahoruco area and San Juan de la Maguana must have held some appeal to indigenous people who remembered Caonabo for his fierce resistance to the Spanish.

Another cacique who may have been tied to Maguana was Manicaotex, assigned to an encomendero in  La Concepción with 79 indigenous people in his community.[23] There is no evidence this is the same person as the brother of Caonabo with the same name, but a connection is possible. In fact, the name is reminiscent of the Taino word manicato, perhaps signifying a bold leader. Another cacique who may have been originally from the area of San Juan de la Maguana (or Azua, likely part of the larger cacicazgo of Maguana) was Alonso de Ojeda. Though assigned to an encomendero in La Buenaventura, the Hieronymite Interrogatory of 1517 specifically named him as one of the caciques who conspired to flee and resist Spanish attempts at forced relocations.[24] With 135 indigenous people under his leadership, he may have been one of the more important caciques in the Maguana or Azua area.[25] 

Lingering Questions and Modern Sources

After reviewing the French and Spanish (and one English article) sources on Maguana before the 20th century, there are many questions which remain. Was Maguana's dimensions as given by Las Casas accurate? Was Caonabo a Lucayo or Carib? To what extent were the people in the Bahoruco and areas near the modern Haitian border part of his domains? And was his marriage with Anacaona a later development in his life after he consolidated his power at the head of Maguana? Undoubtedly, the marriage alliance with Anacaona strengthened his political position among the matunheri caciques of the island. One wonders if Caonabo's political rise, despite his foreign origins, was tied to a guatiao or fictive kinship link with the previous lineage of Maguana.  Or, was Caonabo a Lucayo or "Carib" related to the ruling dynasty of Maguana? The question of Caonabo's 3 or 4 brothers and the apparent succession of the throne to a brother might be an indication of maternal lineage rooted in the region. Perhaps Caonabo's branch was able to seize power through the effective military leadership of Caonabo. Furthermore, one wonders if the Uxmatex, a cacique and captain of Caonabo, was another one of his brothers.

Moving into the 20th century, several secondary sources shed further light on Maguana with the aid of ethnohistory and newer approaches to the archive. The 20th century Dominican historian, Casimiro Moya, speculated that the territory of Maguana encompassed the Cibao, Maniey, Azua and Banique.[26] Sven Loven, author of a masterpiece on the indigenous Caribbean, seemed to prefer Caonabo as a Lucayo whose success in wars preceded his ascent to the position of cacique of Maguana. He also believed that the Corral de los Indios was a sanctuary site. The crown of Caonabo was also described as having wings and gold-encrusted eyes.[27] Samuel Wilson, based on Las Casas, recounted how Caonabo was captured and the brass bell of La Isabela that could talk.[28] Intriguingly, the fact that it took 18 months before Behechio of Xaragua tried to annex parts of Maguana after the fall of Caonabo was also important, perhaps showing how the defeat of Caonabo and his brother destroyed the paramount chiefdom's stability.[29] E.W. Stone likewise proposes the sacred spaces held by Maguana included El Cacique de Charco de los Indios, Río Chacuey, Cueva Pomier, and Pico Duarte would have enhanced the status of Caonabo.[30] 

Besides these 20th century sources, several additional scholars have analyzed aspects of Caonabo's life or the Maguana cacicazgo. Valmé, drawing on a perhaps erroneous method, estimated the Corral de los Indios site's batey, of 37,994 square meters, could have held 11,400 people. Moreover, Maguana contained more than 45 drainage basins, another sign of the area's agricultural potential and attraction to people.[31] Bernardo Vega, who drew heavily upon the map of Morales and other sources, problematically asserted a Ciguayo origin for Caonabo but failed to provide evidence.[32]  Cassá, however, theorized that Caonabo wanted to use Christian cemí power in his war against the Spanish, which could be why Caonabo was willing to accept European gifts.[33] Deagan, in her study of En Bas Saline, the probable site of Guacanagari's capital, has also cited sources on Columbus enslaving 600 of Caonabo's subjects in 1494/5.[34] 

Significantly, Jean Fouchard, the Haitian historian, also proposed that a Haitian "Chant de guerre de Caonabo" from the 19th century is an authentic specimen of indigenous literature. First published in La Selve's study of Haitian literature, the song is full of Kalinago words like boutou. There's also a proposal that Caonabo was from Guadeloupe, which is interesting since the indigenes of Guadeloupe were in contact with Puerto Rico.[35] It is not implausible for an adventuresome Kalinago from Guadeloupe or the Lesser Antilles to have reached Hispaniola, too. But the chant's fusion of mostly Kalinago words with a few examples of Taino words seems more typical of a 19th century Haitian literary style, which sometimes conflated Kalinago and Taino cultures. Thus, the song is full of words like Kouroumon and Bayakou. The song also refers to Guacanagari as a traitor, which does match how chroniclers described the animosity between Guacanagari and other caciques of Hispaniola.[36] Since the song's origins are unclear and it is unlikely to be an authentic war song from 1492 or 1493, it is perhaps better seen as an example of how 19th century Haitian authors imagined the areyto. Nonetheless, the claim of an origin in Guadeloupe for Caonabo is not outside the realm of plausibility and has at least some basis in the Spanish chronicles.

The most important sources on Caonabo, however, are the works of Keegan and Ostapkowicz. The former, author of a study on Caonabo as a stranger king, draws extensively on his own archaeological research in the Lucayan islands. Keegan has also tied the notion of Caonabo as "Carib" to a Taino mythical geography. Moreover, the references in the sources to Caonabo and his 3 brothers are reminiscent of Deminan and his 3 brothers in Taino myth).[37] If Caonabo was a wise, stranger figure whose life could parallel important figures in Taino mythology, this model may elucidate how he was able to ascend to the status of most powerful cacique on the island. Keegan even suggests that he could have been the guardian of the mythical cave of origin, Cacibajagua, if it was included in his domains.[38] Of course, we have argued against the location of Cacibajagua in the domains of Caonabo,[39] but the central location of Guacanagari and the gigantic plaza at El Corral de los Indios likely has cosmological significance that went beyond the confines of Maguana. In terms of archaeology, Keegan has identified a possible site for an important village Caonabo may have come from: the MC-6 settlement established no earlier than 1300.[40] If Caonabo was indeed a Lucayan, as indicated by Las Casas, he could have come from this important, cosmologically charged site that was linked to Hispaniola. Indeed, Maguana may have represented the center of the island and the center of the world from the perspective of the indigenous peoples, a notion also shared by Valmé.

Ostapkowicz, on the other hand, brings a keen attention to detail and textual sources with a study of Taino material culture. In her thesis, a study of the Taino duho, Columbus is cited for Caonabo's explanation that every principal cacique of the island believed that after death, people go to a valley where they see their ancestors, eat, access their wives, and more. Caonabo explained that every cacique believed the valley of the afterlife was located somewhere in their own territory, perhaps implying that Coabay was not located in a single place.[41] In her recent study of cloth and fibrous materials, Ostapkowicz delves into an analysis of various items received in tribute from Caonabo's community in 1495. A combination of belts, masks with gold parts, naguas, hammocks, cotton, and sheets of gold were collected from Caonabo's Indians.[42] The presence of much material using cloth, though not as much as the cloth and textiles found in Anacaona's storehouse, indicates the degree to which cotton and textiles were part of the wealth of a cacique. As one of the most powerful caciques, and one whose name referred to gold, it is striking how so much of the tribute collected from Caonabo's subjects consisted of cloth. While gold was used with the masks and other objects given to the Spanish, one can detect a similar sense of value and wealth in Caonabo's Maguana as that of Xaragua. Given the close ties between Xaragua and Maguana, as well as the use of irrigation canals in both chiefdoms, perhaps cotton was one of the additional sources of wealth for Maguana. Alternatively, cotton may have been given in gift exchanges between Xaragua and Maguana, with the latter possibly serving as a source of gold. 

Conclusion

In summation, the mystery of Caonabo remains. For about 500 years, writers have disagreed on his origin. Keegan's theory of a possible origin in Middle Caicos is intriguing, but of course only a speculation. The "Carib" origin theory could still be true, but academics should explore the links between Hispaniola and the Lesser Antilles. For instance, the finding of Hispaniola-styled duhos at sites in the Lesser Antilles may be evidence of elite exchange or trade, perhaps pointing to a possible Kalinago origin of Caonabo through one of these networks. Moreover, questions remain on the domain of Maguana and how the chiefdom may have looked before 1492. In terms of the chiefdom's characteristics, the existence of irrigation canals or ditches as well as control of gold-producing areas likely made Maguana a populous center of attraction for much of Hispaniola. The alliance with Xaragua, another densely populated region with ample cotton production, likely included military dimensions that may have made Caonabo one of, if not the most, powerful caciques in Hispaniola. Finally, Caonabo's foreign origins and deft navigation of the political landscape of the island made him the best positioned to understand the threat posed by the Spanish.

 



[1]  M.L.E. Moreau de Saint-Méry, A topographical and political description of the Spanish part of Saint-Domingo: containing, general observations on the climate, population, and productions; on the character and manners of the inhabitants; with an account of the several branches of the government, Volume 1, 34.

[2] Pierre-François-Xavier de Charlevoix, Histoire de l'Isle espagnole ou de S. Domingue, Vol. 1, 81-82, 172.

[3] Carl Ortwin Sauer, The Early Spanish Main, 84.

[4] Émile Nau, Histoire des caciques d'Haïti, 116-117.

[6]  Alexander O. Exquemelin, The Buccaneers of America, 36.

[7] Thomas Madiou, Histoire d’Haiti, Tome VI, 356.

[8] Robert Schomburgk, “Ethnological Researches in Santo Domingo,” 91-92.

[9] Martha Ellen Davis, La otra ciencia: el vodu dominicano el vodú dominicano como religión y medicina populares, 138.

[10] Christopher Columbus in Ramón Pané, An Account of the Antiquities of the Indians, 45.

[11] Christopher Columbus, The Journal of Christopher Columbus (During His First Voyage), 141.

[12] Cristóbal Colón, Textos y documentos completos: Relaciones de viajes, cartas y memoriales, 243.

[13] Ibid., 256.

[14] Ibid., 277.

[15] Ibid., 324.

[16] Lynne Guitar, Cultural Genesis: Relationships among Indians, Africans, and Spaniards in rural. Hispaniola, first half of the sixteenth century, 121.

[17] Peter Martyr d’Anghiera, De Orbe Novo.

[19]  Bartolomé de Las Casas, Apologética historia sumaria.

[20] Jalil Sued-Badillo, Caribe taíno: Ensayos históricos sobre el siglo XVI, 19.

[23] Ibid., 584.

[24] Behique Dunama, “Interrogatorio de los Jeronimos.”

[25] Luis Arranz Márquez, Repartimientos y encomiendas en la Isla Española (El repartimiento de Alburquerque de 1514), 567.

[28] Samuel Wilson, Hispaniola: Caribbean Chiefdoms in the Age of Columbus, 86.

[29] Ibid., 91.

[30] E.W. Stone, “The Conquest of Española as a “Structure of Conjuncture,”’ 371.

[31] Gilbert R. Valmé, Atabey, Yucayequey, Caney : 6000 ans d'amenagement territorial prehispanique sur l'ile d'Ayiti / Haiti/ Republique Dominicaine, 15, 181.

[32] Bernardo Vega, Los Cacicazgos de la Hispaniola, 57.

[33] Roberto Cassá, Los Tainos de la Española, 222.

[34] Kathleen Deagan, En Bas Saline: A Taíno Town Before and After Columbus, 34.

[35] Jean Fouchard, Langue et littérature des aborigènes d'Ayti, 91.

[36] Ibid., 92.

[37] William F. Keegan, Taíno Indian Myth and Practice: The Arrival of the Stranger King, 35, 45.

[38] Ibid., 46-47.

[39] Behique Dunama, “Caonao (Cahonao).”

[40] William F. Keegan, Taíno Indian Myth and Practice: The Arrival of the Stranger King, 182.

[41] Joanna Ostapkowicz, Taino wooden sculpture: rulership and the visual arts in the 12–16th century Caribbean, 518.

Saturday, January 3, 2026

European Ancestry (23andMe)


Although our interests in genealogy and DNA testing are primarily centered on African ancestry, we did find it interesting how our 23andMe results indicate a smaller French ancestry than Ancestry. Given our roots in the Spanish Caribbean, we expected most of our European ancestry to be from the Iberian Peninsula. Yet French was only 0.3% here despite our Ancestry results showing 2%. We're also assuming the Swedish and Swiss, Southwestern German and Western Austrian estimates are catching some of the Germanic or western European ancestry similar to that foud in France? The other surprise, although not really shocking for the Iberian Peninsula, was seeing our Y Chromosome Haplogroup: J-L26. 

Friday, January 2, 2026

Effi


Although we first heard "Effi" from Bobby Hutcherson's Patterns several years ago, revisiting classic jazz-waltz tunes reminded us of how great this Stanley Cowell-penned composition was. A live recording from 1965 without Hutcherson is also quite enchanting.

Thursday, January 1, 2026

Revisiting Peep Show

 

We found this recent 20th anniversary special on Peep Show quite hilarious and interesting. They even brought into the actresses who played Dobby and Nancy! It was fascinating to hear about the writing process and how the writers and central cast perceived the show, its development over time, and what worked well about the show. Like they admit, the show had to end because Jez and Mark were no longer young men. It probably also helped that each season only consisted of 6 episodes. That meant that by the end of the 9th season, one could not get tired of the show. Alas, any American adaptation of Peep Show would probably ruin everything that worked so well...

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Jeannis

Whilst perusing old records and files, we came across the birth record for a relative (related by marriage) from Jacmel. Born in 1920, he was the son of Letrois Jeannis, a man who appears to have been a descendant of Mérisier Jeannis (1833-1908). 

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

The Kanta of Kebbi and Borno

 

Sword of the Kanta of Kebbi (Kirk-Greene & Hogben)

Although the history of Kebbi’s meteoric rise to major power in 16th century West Africa is well-known, its conflicts with Borno remain little studied. Despite oral tradition and textual sources referring to at least one major campaign launched by Borno against the rising power of Kebbi, the exact details of this episode remain contradictory. On the one hand, Muhammad Bello and Shaykh Dan Tafa, writing in the 19th century and presumably drawing on oral tradition, wrote of a large-scale conflict between the Kanta of Kebbi and Borno’s Mai Ali (r. 1538-1539). On the other hand, other sources either do not specify the Sayfawa mai who launched the invasion and failed siege of Surame, or they attribute it to Muhammad (r. 1519-1538) or Dunama b. Muhammad (r. 1539-1557), other Sayfawa monarchs. We shall endeavor to explore this campaign through a fusion of primary and secondary sources, hoping to use the more accurate chronology of Lange for piecing together this illustrious campaign in the annals of 16th century Borno and Kebbi. This brief article shall argue that the epic war with Kebbi recalled by tradition may have been launched by Abd Allah (r. 1557-1564), but the conflict was tied to larger questions or regional hegemony, commerce and geopolitics in 16th century West Africa. 

Review of the Textual Sources

Beginning with the written sources will provide an overview of the conflicts between Kebbi and Borno. The earliest written source to directly allude to military conflict between Borno and Kebbi is the brief account of West Africa written by Anania. Not merely reproducing the description of Leo Africanus, Anania drew from more updated sources. For instance, informants who had traveled to Kano or those who had been to Tripoli and heard of Borno were possible sources of information on Kebbi’s conflict with Borno. According to Anania, the ruler of Kebbi was also so powerful that he was called an “emperor”. Indeed, “Puis vient Aquà et Cabi, don’t les noirs appellant le prince empereur à cause de sa puissance.”[1] Since the editions of Anania’s work were published in the 1570s and 1580s, this suggests that Kebbi’s military hegemony in much of Hausaland was still effective well into the second half of the 16th century. Later, in his brief account of Borno, Anania wrote that, “Ce prince est si puissant que plusiers fois il a mis sur pied de guerre cent mille hommes contre le roi de Cabi.[2] While he unfortunately did not name the mai in this war, this large-scale campaign is a good candidate for the war that preceded the death of the Kanta of Kebbi. Indeed, even when one considers the figure of 100,000 as an exaggeration or overstatement, there was clearly a sense of a major conflict between Borno and Kebbi in this era. Since Mai Ali only reigned for about a year in the 1530s, it is difficult to imagine him having been capable of launching more than one expedition against Kebbi with vast numbers of troops. In terms of the most detailed 16th century Borno source, the chronicles of Ahmad b. Furtu, no reference to Kebbi is made. This strongly supports the notion that Borno’s conflicts with Kebbi occurred during a reign previous to that of Idris b. Ali (r. 1564-1596). Interestingly, Idris b. Ali did campaign against Kano, however.

The subsequent written sources from the 17th century shed little additional light on the matter. Ahmad Baba, writing in the early 17th century, referred to Kebbi’s people as among the Muslims. In fact, they had been Muslims for over 60 years.[3] This information is in general accordance with the rise of a Muslim power at Kebbi earlier in the 16th century. Later in the same century, the Tarikh al-Sudan of al-Sa’di, provides a much more extensive background for the ascent of Kebbi political and military might. According to this chronicle, Askiya Muhammad I campaigned against Agades in 1516, defeating the sultan, al-Adala. However, Kuta, who bore the title of Kanta, rebelled against the Askiya afterwards over displeasure over the division of booty. Kuta allegedly asked the Dendi-fari for his share of the booty from the Agades campaign and was refused, leading to his revolt with the support of his own troops. Naturally, Songhay endeavored to end Kuta Kanta’s revolt in 1517-1518, but the Askiya failed. According to al-Sa’di, the Kanta already had a base or city at Leka, too.[4] Even subsequent Songhay rulers failed to defeat Kebbi. Askiya Muhammad Bonkana, for instance, was defeated by Kebbi at Wantaramasa. Even Dawud failed to gain the upper-hand in his conflict with the Kanta in 1551/2-1552/3. Overall, Songhay hegemony over Kebbi was brief, beginning sometime during the reign of Sunni Ali and effectively ending by 1517.[5] In terms of Kebbi’s conflict with Borno, however, al-Sa’di provides us a date for the death of Muhammad Kanta, Sultan of Leka, 24 May 1561.[6] This date of 1561 for Muhammad Kanta’s death has been the basis for a c.1561 date for the unsuccessful Borno campaign remembered in tradition. Moreover, it identifies the Kanta who perished in 1561 as a different person from Kuta Kanta, who rebelled against Songhay in 1517. If one works backwards from 1561 with the assumption of the regnal length of 38 years for this Kanta, Muhammad Kanta must have occupied the throne of Kebbi from 1523-1561. If, alternatively, Muhammad Kanta and Kuta Kanta were the same individual, the Tarikh al-Sudan demonstrates that the Kanta who defeated Borno was the very same individual who bested the Songhay earlier in the century.

Besides these West African sources, Girard, the enslaved Frenchman living in Tripoli, also wrote briefly of Kebbi and Borno. According to him, it was during the reign of Mahi-Mahomet (Mai Muhammad) that the famous war against Kebbi was waged. Clearly borrowing from Anania, Girard sought to identify a specific Sayfawa mai in the war. His years, however, are not reliable unless one considers this Muhammad, who was said to have also made an alliance with Dragut in Tripoli in 1555, as Dunama b. Muhammad.[7] The overall picture from these 17th century sources suggest that the illustrious war between Borno and Kebbi occurred before the reign of Idris b. Ali (1564-1596) and that the Kanta of Kebbi who died in 1561 might have been the second king to bear that title. They also attest to Kebbi's regional paramount status in Hausaland for part of the 16th century.

Moving into the 19th century, one finds very similar accounts of Kebbi’s war with Borno in the works of Muhammad Bello and Dan Tafa. For Bello, the people of Kebbi had a Katsina mother and Songhay father. This notion appears to be based on Kebbi’s oral traditions, since “cousinship” with the people of Katsina was believed in the 20th century, too. Furthermore, on the first Kanta, he wrote, “And it is said that he conquered Katsina, Kano, Gobir, Zaria and the contry of Ahir and some parts of Songhai land. He also waged war on Borno.”[8] This Kanta, named Muhammad in Bello’s account, died at Jiriwa from an arrow wound received at Dugul near Katsina.[9] Again, Bello's history emphasizes Kebbi's status as a major power in Hausaland during this period. 


A plan of Surame (Kirk-Greene & Hogben), the capital of Kebbi besieged by Borno in c. 1561.

Dan Tafa's account is unsurprisingly quite similar to that of Muhammad Bello. In his chronicle, the Kanta had rebelled against his Fulani overlords and conquered Zamfara, Zaberma, Ahir and engaged in conflict with Borno more than once. This Kanta also built Gungu, Leka, and Surame. He was even said to have made his Tuareg subjects responsible for transporting water from a lake called Tanshama to Surame and forced them to transport horses of the Kanta’s military garrison. Given these exactions, the ruler of Ahir, or Agades, sought the aid of Mai Ali of Borno against the Kanta. The Kanta was defeated outside Surame but Borno’s forces were unable to take the Kebbi capital. Whilst returning to Borno, Ali’s forces were attacked at Nguru and defeated 7 times by the pursuing Kebbi forces.[10] Of course, no sources closer to the period in question reference the Fulani as overlords or masters of Kebbi. It is perhaps a garbled allusion to Kebbi oral traditions of the Kanta spending time amongst the Fulani before his rise to power. Nonetheless, Dan Tafa's account reiterates the notion of the Kanta's exploitation of the Tuareg (among other groups) and the interests of Kebbi in the north. With Agades a major nexus point for Hausaland's trans-Saharan trade, the Kanta's interests in the north undeniably attracted the interest of Borno and its sphere of influence in the north.

Besides Bello and Dan Tafa, Heinrich Barth also wrote of Kebbi’s wars with Borno. For Barth, the famous battle with Kebbi was led by Mai Muhammad of Borno, and Kebbi was ruled by Tomo at the time. This is contradicted by other sources, however.[11] Barth was likely drawing from Girard in naming the mai as Muhammad, but his identification of Tomo as the Kebbi king is certainly erroneous. This suggests that by the 1850s, when Barth was visiting the region, he was unable to access historical traditions from the descendants of the Kanta at Argungu. Nonetheless, his account follows the trend of identifying Kebbi as a major power in the region historically.

Reviewing Oral Tradition

After reviewing the major written sources on this particular bellicose episode in the annals of Borno’s history, let’s shift to oral traditions and 20th century accounts. E.J. Arnett, author of the Sokoto Gazetteer, drew on the same aforementioned sources plus oral traditions to write about Kanta’s war with Borno. In his account, Mai Ali of Borno came to attack Kebbi via the Sosebaki region and besieged the city of Surame. He generally followed Bello and Dan Tafa, but added that Muhammad Kanta, the first of the sultans, reigned for 38 years.[12] H.R. Palmer, another colonial-era scholar, believed that Borno’s famous conflict with Kebbi must have took place during the reign of Muhammad b. Idris, not Ali b. Idris. In addition, traditions of Borno origin north and west of Kebbi held by various tribes referencing Mai Ali of Borno suggested to Palmer that Borno’s interventions in this part of the Central Sudan were of a long-lasting nature. As for Surame, the walls of the Kebbi capital were briefly described as being of 10 miles in circumference and demonstrated the use of stones. Lastly, Palmer dated the famous war to c. 1527/8, a date which undoubtedly too early.[13] H.A.S. Johnston also alluded to the Sayfawa-Kanta war. According to tradition, the Kanta punished the Tuareg by forcing them to aid in the construction of Surame. They were additionally forced to bring water for their camels from their own region. When Borno attacked Surame, tradition also remembered the defenders using corpses that were placed at defensive positions on its walls to trick the Bornoan army into believing that they had more troops. This has led to the famous phrase “dariya ba loto,” or laughter without end, in remembrance of this moment.[14] Thus, a ruse as well as military skill were the sources of the Kanta's victory against Borno. The cause of the war was clearly linkd to Kebbi's northward expansion and influence in Asben, too. 

But the best attempt at using tradition and written sources was attempted by Kirk-Greene and Hogben. They reported the “tribal cousinship” of the Kebbawa and Katsina, for instance. Further, the story of Muhammad Kanta’s skill at boxing and links to the Fulani appear in traditions. They even share a praise song for Muhammad Kanta which contains numerous kirari. For example, descriptions of Muhammad Kanta saying “I am the club with which to beat an elephant” strongly emphasize his military strength. Tradition even remembers a wife of Muhammad Kanta, Makulo, or Ayeshe. The daughter of the ruler of Agades, Makulo’s jealousy of Kanta’s first wife is associated with the creation of the town of Gungu in one legend. As for the famous war with Borno, the siege of Surame’s failure is attributed to the placement of corpses with slit mouths along the defensive positions of the town walls. This rich oral tradition of the Kanta naturally emphasizes his military attributes but adds an additional layer with the Tuareg wife. She was allegedly jealous of the Kanta’s first wife being favored over her in spite of her dark skin and commoner origin.[15] Consequently, the Kanta's strength, tradition of leadership and influence in Asben are suggestive of a possible area of contention or concern for Borno in Hausaland at this period.

Synthesizing the Sources

Upon revisiting Palmer, Arnett, Kirk-Greene and Hogben and other 20th century colonial sources, questions linger on the details of the Borno war. Kirk-Greene and Hogben believed the Kanta who fought the famous war with Borno was the founder of the Kebbi sultanate (at least as a major power). If, however, one follows the chronicle of al-Sa’di, written in the 17th century, the first Kanta who rebelled against Songhay authority was named Kuta. This may have been the father of Muhammad Kanta, although it is possible that Kuta was another name of the same figure. Nonetheless, postcolonial scholars have sought to address the contradictions and problems of this period with inclusion of other sources. Djibo Hamani, for instance, used historical traditions from Agades to support the 1561 date for the Borno-Kebbi war. After all, the sultan of Agades was remembered for returning from an expedition in Adar around this period, although Hamani mistakenly believed the mai was likely Dunama b. Muhammad. This is problematic since the most accurate chronology of the Sayfawa would make Abd Allah the probable ruler at the time of the c. 1561 war. However, Hamani’s theory that the sultan of Agades may have accompanied the mai in the Kebbi campaign is plausible, particularly since he had requested aid of Borno against Kebbi.[16] Indeed, Borno later backed a competing royal faction in Agades against the faction supported by Kebbi in the early 1600s.[17] Moreover, the chronicles of Agades indicate that the sultan of Agades who would have reigned in c. 1561, Muhammad el-Adel, seized power in 1556 and reigned 39 years.[18] This sultan, who held power for a relatively long time and was said to have returned from Adar (an area once under the influence of Kebbi), is a good contender for the Agades ruler who may have asked for Borno’s help against Kebbi. Moreover, the route followed by the Bornoan troops, which crossed the Sosebaki states and stayed in areas north of Katsina and Kano, may have passed through Adar before reaching Kebbi. This route would have also favored a path through which troops from Asben may have met with Borno’s army en route to Kebbi.

In light of all the available evidence, the major war with Borno remembered in tradition probably is the one that took place in c. 1561. However, due to the sources referring to intermittent conflict between Kebbi and Borno in the 16th century, it is likely that war or raids occurred the reigns of earlier Sayfawa monarchs. Thus, a war may have took place during the brief reign of Ali b. Idris. Another conflict may have emerged during the reign of Dunama b. Muhammad, although he had a war with the Bulala sultans of Kanem that may have been far more pressing.[19] Likewise, Abd Allah b. Dunama, whose reign included a lengthy famine remembered in the Diwan, may have had more pressing concerns from the Bulala, Sao groups and others in Borno noted to have engaged in rebellion or banditry at the beginning of Idris b. Ali’s reign. The sources suggest that a major conflagration developed during the reign of Abd Allah b. Dunama, but this may have actually overlapped with the regency of Aisa Kili bint Dunama. Is this why the Borno sources are largely silent on the c. 1561 war with Kebbi? Could the gender of the Bornoan ruler at the time have possibly complicated how the war was remembered by later generations, even if Aisa Kili was known for her military prowess?

Conclusion

In summation, the tale of Borno’s conflicts with Kebbi in the 16th century is an important element of Borno’s geopolitical relations within West Africa. This article has argued that the Kebbi–Borno war should be understood as the product of buffer-state politics and Sayfawa geopolitics rather than a single act of aggression by Muhammad Kanta. With Kebbi as a major power in the area between Songhay and Borno, direct conflict between these two imperial powers was largely avoided. However, Kebbi’s expansion likely impinged upon Borno’s influence in Hausaland and Asben. This, in turn, led to conflicts as the Sayfawa likely sought to regain lost influence in Asben, the major commercial artery to the north for Hausaland. Similarly, Borno’s political leadership during the 16th century, before Idris b. Ali (r. 1564-1596) included the reestablishment of relations with Tripoli, famine, and conflicts with the Bulala. Kebbi’s ascent may have paradoxically aided Borno by limiting Songhay eastward expansion and creating a more regionally united Hausaland. Nonetheless, interest from the part of Borno in preserving its influence in Asben and parts of Hausland made conflict inevitable. This is why numerous wars (and likely raiding expeditions) were probably launched throughout the reign of Muhammad Kanta. It is very likely that Muhammad Bello and Dan Tafa remembered Ali b. Idris as the ruler at the time of the significant 1561 campaign due to there actually having been some sort of war or conflict in c. 1538-1539. Likewise, Mai Dunama b. Muhammad’s interests in an alliance with Draghut may very well have included increased trade to ensure a larger share of trans-Saharan commerce with Tripoli remained with Borno. Idris b. Ali, whose reign included a successful termination of the conflict with the Bulala sultans of Kanem as well as consolidation of Sayfawa rule in Borno, was probably able to ensure Borno’s quick recovery from the devastating loss to Kebbi. In truth, dynastic squabbling upon the death of Muhammad Kanta may have been another factor as Kebbi’s power and influence in Hausaland withered away within a century or so after Muhammad Kanta.



[1] Anania, “L’interieur de l’Afrique occidentale d’après  Giovanni Lorenzo Anania,” 343.

[2] Ibid., 347.

[3] Ahmad Baba, Mi'raj al-su'ud: Ahmad Baba's Replies on Slavery, 45.

[4] Al-Sa’di, Timbuktu and the Songhay Empire: Al-Sadi's Tarikh al-Sudan down to 1613 and other contemporary documents, 113-114.

[5] Ibid., 92, 127, 147.

[6] Ibid., 150.

[7] Rémi Dewière, L'esclave, le savant et le sultan: représentations du monde et diplomatie au sultanat du Borno (XVIe-XVIIe siècles), 612.

[8] Muhammad Bello, A history of Islam, scholarship and revivalism in Western Sudan : being an annotated translation with introduction of Infaqul-Maisur fi Tarikh Bilad al-Tukur of Sultan Muhammad Bello bin Fodio 81.

[9] Ibid., 82.

[10] Shaykh Dan Tafa, Rawdat al-Afkaar, 9-10.

[11] Heinrich Barth, Travels and Discoveries in North and Central Africa Vol. 3 (1896), 671-672.

[12] E.J. Arnett, in Nigerian Northern Provinces, 3-6, Sokoto Gazetteer, 113.

[13] H.R. Palmer, Bornu Sahara and Sudan, 229.

[14] H.A.S. Johnston, A Selection of Hausa Stories, 117-118.

[15] Kirk-Greene & Hogben, The Emirates of Northern Nigeria: A Preliminary Survey of their Historical Traditions, 239-246.

[16] Djibo Hamani, Au carrefour du Soudan et de la Berbérie: le sultanat touareg de l'Ayar, 211.

[17] Muhammad Nur Alkali, Kanem-Borno Under the Sayfawa: A Study of the Origin, Growth, and Collapse of a Dynasty (891-1846), 253-254.

[18] Yves Urvoy, “Chroniques d'Agadès,” 152.

[19] Dierk Lange, Le dīwān des sultans du (Kānem-)Bornū: Chronologie et histoire d'un royaume africain (de la fin du Xe siècle jusqu'à 1808), 80.