Tuesday, July 6, 2021

Foundation and Earth

Isaac Asimov's final installment, chronologically, in the Foundation series was, in our opinion, an unnecessary addition. Whereas Foundation's Edge at least featured real or at least exciting conflicts with multiple perspectives as the narrative shifted focus to different protagonists, Foundation and Earth focuses entirely on Golan Trevize, Pelorat, and Bliss on their quest for Earth. It is, more or less, a direct sequel to the previous novel without much change in the timeline of the projected 1,000 years predicted by Hari Seldon. Of course, as the great novel that sought to connect the Robots series and Foundation universe, the fusion is far from seamless. It didn't necessarily make much sense that the Galactic Empire would have, for the most part, completely forgotten the history of robotics. Nor does the reader find much excitement here. This dialogue-heavy novel is mostly centered on specific stops the trio make before finally reaching Earth and a certain character from the Robots novels. 

However, the novel's frequent digressions on which path from the previous novel is the best path forward for humanity contains occasionally interesting references to the history of space colonization and the Foundation universe. Unfortunately, much of it seems to revolve around the same recurring doubts of Trevize and a quickly irritating personal disagreement between Bliss/Gaia and Trevize. Their constant bickering does not make for entertaining reading. Nor was the ultimate "revelation" about the force behind Gaia and psychohistory really logical, although Trevize raising the possibility of intelligent life in other galaxies was interesting. Indeed, in End of Eternity, we know that had humans never developed interstellar travel, another species would have done it and humanity eventually went extinct. However, in this version of human history, without Eternity, there is no confirmation of alien life. The novel's final scene hints at possible "aliens from within" (perhaps Follom and the people of Solaria), so maybe Galaxia seems the best solution for preventing humanity from extinguishing itself. 

So, the necessity of Gaia or a collective consciousness in a superorganism becomes strategic for planning the Galaxy's defense against possible outside forces. Sure, one can say, Galaxia becomes more attractive than a Second Galactic Empire, when seen in that light. And the various "Isolated" planets and lost Spacer settlements seem to offer additional evidence of the danger of too much isolation and individuality. But it never quite struck us why humanity would have to submit to a collective consciousness when a Second Empire that combined the best of the First and Second Foundations could have led to a rational Galactic state encompassing advances in mentalics and technology. Nor do many of the obstacles faced by Trevize and company actually strike us as compelling or threatening. Moss and feral dogs on two deserted Spacer planets are hardly interesting, and the novel's episode on Solaria, while another interesting link between the Robots and Foundation series, does not suffice. 

All things considered, Asimov should have either left the series alone or at least written a shorter adventure tale that did a better job clarifying the future history of the Galaxy. Perhaps less obsession with backsides of female characters and, maybe, juggling between protagonists to illustrate what is going on with the galaxy, would have created a more effective narrative. Sure, it was interesting to see Solaria develop into a society of hermaphrodites who view others as only half-humans, and the "primitives" on Alpha provided an occasionally interesting example of both "primitiveness" and technological advancement in their own form of unhealthy isolation. Clearly, Asimov envisioned the future of humanity lay in further association and union, yet one cannot comprehend exactly why Galaxia and the vision of humanity's future informed by ancient robots is the best direction for ensuring humanity's future. Nor does anyone consider the ethics of fusing a human child's brain with that of the decaying robot?

No comments:

Post a Comment