Wednesday, February 15, 2012

The Kingdom of This World





"For this reason, bowed down by suffering and duties, beautiful in the midst of his misery, capable of loving in the face of afflictions and trials, man finds his greatness, his fullest measure, only in the Kingdom of This World."

Alejo Carpentier's The Kingdom of This World, translated into English by Harriet de Onis, is an interesting literary interpretation of the Haitian Revolution. Focusing on an old, ex-slave, Ti Noel, Carpentier uses historical figures and plays with the dates to show how the worldview of black slaves shaped the Haitian Revolution. Indeed, Carpentier influenced the 'magic realism' of later Latin American writes with his theory of lo real maravilloso, or marvelous realism, which emphasized the natural, extant systems of thought found within Latin America and the Caribbean rather than artificial, contrived notions of the supernatural one finds in surrealist artists and writers from Europe. Thus, Macandal, the one-armed slave believed by French whites to have died, burned to death, escapes by transforming into an insect and flying away according to the black slaves.

The opposing perspectives on the death of Macandal, however, are not diametrically opposed, since Vodou incorporates Christian/Catholic influences of Spanish and French colonial structures in the Caribbean. In addition to Macandal transforming into animals during and after his widespread poisoning of white planters in the Plaine du Nord, but Ti Noel himself also gains the ability to transform into animals. Other supernatural phenomena also occur, such as black slave rebels becoming impervious to bullets in while battling white troops. Moreover, the 'marvelous' reality these ex-slaves experience includes a world in which the lwa of Africa are omnipresent and necessary for the liberation of slaves. Indeed, it is through Vodou that liberation is achieved in the text, since Boukman leading the Bois Caiman ceremony was a Vodou ritual that included invoking the lwa. Despite the huge ethnic differences between Mandingos, Congos, and others, Vodou unites them in opposition to the material conditions of slavery because of it's syncretistic nature that incorporates aspects of each ethnic group and creolized black person's 'marvelous reality.'

On another level, the novel depicts the Haitian Revolution as similar to Animal Farm. After the success of overthrowing French colonialism and slavery, the people of northern Haiti continue to suffer under the black monarchy of Henri Christophe, whose Europhile regime exploits the ex-slaves through another system of forced labor. Until Christophe is then overthrown, and mulattoes from the South take power and endeavor to establish another state of slavery-like conditions, black ex-slaves continue reactionary rather than revolutionary changes. In each case, the French, Christophe's black monarchy, and the mulattoes, the black peasants respond with reactionary. For Carpentier, each individual must recognize the importance of striving for one's best in The Kingdom of This World, or the material world in which we live, rather than putting faith entirely in the gods of Africa for sustenance. Without dismissing the importance of Vodou and the supernatural worldview of Haitian blacks, the people must take control of their own destiny and transcend the exploitative conditions under which blacks are exposed due to French slavery, or black and mulatto attempts to restore plantation agriculture. Once this is achieved, The Kingdom of This World can surpass the Kingdom of Heaven.

On a historical level, however, one must question the ahistorical assumptions and generalizations made by Carpentier. There is an assumption that all the current lwa of Haiti (20th century, I suppose) were present in 18th century Saint Domingue. Furthermore, Carpentier's description of violence in Saint Domingue during the Revolution emphasizes black rape of white women like white narratives from the period. This implies that black men were/are rapists and extra-violent, rather than rational actors in the historical process of the Revolution. One must also mention that historically, despite their neglect and continued repression by various Haitian states, the Haitian peasant did succeed in largely unseating the plantation system of labor.  Overall, this novel is somewhat interesting since the white Cuban author writes about a black revolution. However, the novel's incomplete coverage of the Revolution, historical anachronisms, and weak plot do weaken its overall narrative structure. The concept of 'marvelous realism' and its influence on the magic realism of later Latin American writers is also highly significant for urging the adoption of local folklore and beliefs to construct an authentic perspective from those the writer wishes to represent. Rather than mimicking European styles and literary forms, writers from non-Western regions have gained a powerful tool for representing their own regions. 

9 comments:

  1. Good review,overall. I think you are too harsh on Christophe. The man had only the European models to work with. He did his best to educate the people of his kingdom by starting universal education with the help of Prince Saunders and the English abolitionist movement.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Saunders. Haiti would be a better place today if his policy on education had been continued and expanded. Carpentier's racist novel reduces Ti Noel to the level of a beast by having him live in some hole in the wall, away from all human contact. I really don't see what's to be admired in this book. You ought to do a post on Prince Saunders and the attempt at universal education in early Haiti. The idea that it was all tyranny just for the aggrandizement of one man is bs in my opinion. Had Christophe conquered the entire nation instead of Boyer it's unlikely that France would have extorted the debt that Petion had suggested Haiti pay to France. I would suggest the reading of Christophe: King of Haiti byHubert Cole for a more balanced an historically accurate view of that great man.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting, I have heard of Prince Saunders but have yet to do research regarding their impact on education in 19th century Haiti. Also, perhaps you're right about Christophe not being entirely autocratic, but his rule essentially replaced slavery with serfdom for the majority of the black population living in the north. So, to me, it seems that Christophe was that great, unless, however, his educational program was expanded. But then the problem would then center on how would Christophe's kingdom survive without exploited, cheap labor from the new peasants? I don't know...but I will try to find that book by Cole. How did you come across the blog, if you don't mind me asking?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I did a Google search on a subject regarding Haiti and your blog came up. I found your blog one of the more serious ones dealing with Haiti, so I've been lurking since.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Also, perhaps you're right about Christophe not being entirely autocratic, but his rule essentially replaced slavery with serfdom for the majority of the black population living in the north. So, to me, it seems that Christophe was that great, unless, however, his educational program was expanded." I'm not arguing that he wasn't autocratic. He was, but not all autocrats are created equal. Petion wasn't any more "democratic" than Christophe, just less competent. His government and that of Boyer spent a great deal of their time repressing peasants fighting under the leadership of Goman.The mystery for me about this period is why did the South prevail against the North which was much richer. $20 million was found in Christophe's treasury when his kingdom collapsed, that would be the equivalent of present day Haiti having $429,000,000,000.00 in its treasury. In 1814, rather than negotiate Haiti's independence with France he had Medina, their agent, executed for daring to enter his kingdom, contrast that with Petion actually suggesting to France that Haiti pay them for enslaving blacks for nearly two centuries. There is no comparison Christophe stands head and shoulder above Petion and Boyer. Russia made great strides under the Autocratic rule of Peter the great. In evaluating tyrants one should choose the more competent. As for the claim that serfdom was established under Toussaint, Dessalines and Christophe I find that claim dubious. The peasants were paid wages and they got health care and other services, that doesn't sound like serfdom to me where the lord even had the right to bed one's wife if he wanted to, it sounds more like a company town where the employees are under a capitalist autocrat. The peasants wanted the right to do as they pleased with the land. By the time his regime fell he had began to distribute land to the peasants as was done in the south.

    ReplyDelete
  5. True, but didn't Christophe's kingdom come to an end due to popular unrest and a revolt? Also, please send me some sources on Goman? I have heard of Goman and a short-lived third postcolonial Haitian state that was eventually incorporated into the republic of the south, but haven't found much secondary sources on the topic. Have you read anything by Philippe Girard? He takes a rather interesting stance on the colonial pasts of Toussaint, Dessalines and other key figures of the Haitian Revolution, suggesting that Dessalines was a slave by someone in Toussaint's family! Furthermore, both him and other scholars take on the position that the postrevolutionary peasant resistance of Haitians against people like Boyer represent earlier developing collective identity of farm workers/peasants/ex-slaves in Haiti of their marginalization and exploitation elites and mixed-race elites (Black Publics and Peasant Resistance by a historical sociologist is quite suggestive on peasant radicalism and resistance due to their marginalization from both black elites from military backgrounds and ancient libre mulattoes. Anyway, do you have any good suggestions on Prince Saunders?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sorry, I only have the above link to wikipedia and the Cole book. you could try these links: http://books.google.com/books/about/Haytian_Papers.html?id=pdY-AAAAYAAJ
    http://www.blackpast.org/?q=aah/prince-saunders-1775-1839
    Hey, I thought you were the scholar, HAha, just kidding.
    Philippe Girard? the béké historian from Guadeloupe? I read an article of his on Jstor on the French navy during Haiti's war of independence, other than that I've read nothing from him and I'm unlikely to since I revile the type he represents. Christophe's Kingdom did perish due to an army mutiny and the type of unrest that became too common in 19th century Haiti, Cole does a passable job on the subject. I was hoping that a young scholar like you, with a more than passing interest, would bring more light to the subject. Goman was named duke of Grand'Anse by Christophe in order to annoy Petion and Boyer, according to Cole. This wikipedia link is an article on Goman. The south was divided between Petion, Rigaud and Borgella for a time. Borgella was the son of the white man Toussaint tasked to write his 1801 constitution. The talk of black and mulatto elites isn't helpful since Pompée De Vastey and a slew of other notables in Christophe's court were just as mulatto as Pétion's men. The tendency to reduce the quarrels of Haiti's ruling class to a question of color should, in my opinion, be resisted.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Is he beke? I thought so since he made a big deal about claiming his Guadeloupean roots, but I wasn't sure if he was a beke or was from a France white family that moved to the Caribbean more recently. He definitely presents himself as "demolishing popular myths" and theories on the origins of Haitian leading revolutionaries of the time, but I am skeptical of some of his claims. Alas, I do not read French very well and cannot properly challenge his assertions since I cannot understand most of the primary source documents! As for the color/race divide in Haiti, I think I am still influenced too much by the Dessalines to Duvalier text on Haitian history, which, at times, likely exaggerates 'racial' divisions in the 'first black republic." You're right though, several of CHristophe's leading court officials, such as De Vastey, were mixed-race. I remember reading somewhere that De Vastey actually lived in France for a while and wrote poetry, too, which did not take on a noticeable political dimension. What are your thoughts then on the 'mulatto-dominated' republic of the south and the eventual reunification of Haiti (and Santo Domingo for a while) under Boyer? African-American immigration from the free black population of the US?

    ReplyDelete
  8. "As for the color/race divide in Haiti, I think I am still influenced too much by the Dessalines to Duvalier text on Haitian history, which, at times, likely exaggerates 'racial' divisions in the 'first black republic."" The color/race divide in Haiti reflects that divide in western civilization. Go to the wikipedia pages for two Haitian-American writers and note how they are described. Marilène Phipps-Kettlewell is described as an American writer born in Haiti but Edwidge Danticat is identified as Haitian-American, the difference is due to the fact that one is white the other black. Haitian has become a synonym for black hence Haiti is "the first black republic". The joke in that appellation is that the Phipps wielded more influence in running Haiti than the Danticats did. "What are your thoughts then on the 'mulatto-dominated' republic of the south and the eventual reunification of Haiti (and Santo Domingo for a while) under Boyer?" Did I not state above that I thought they were a bunch of incompetents who gave away Haiti's future to France? Under Dessalines and Christophe Haitians were willing to fight for their independence, not so under Boyer. France got from Haiti what she had a right to claim only after destroying Haiti militarily. That gutless wonder named Boyer saddled the country with a debt that took over a century to pay, destroyed Haitian manufacturing by eliminating tariffs on French products, etc. Why would Dominicans want to be part of a Haiti that became a slave to France in all but name? Ditto for Black Americans. My problem with the color/race divide take on Haiti isn't that it is a myth and we all get along but that it is used to skirt the fact that Haiti's ruling class, black, mulatto and white, are only the local representatives of the great powers on that territory and act accordingly. During the 19th century a number of financial scandals occurred with the same cast of characters, European operators and their Haitian partners.

    ReplyDelete
  9. True, that. I don't think I have ever heard of Marilene Phipps-Kettlewell...looking her up now

    ReplyDelete